Skip to main content
Log in

Stigmaeid-phytoseiid interactions and the impact of natural enemy complexes on plant-inhabiting mites

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions within the natural enemy complex of plant-inhabiting mites are of practical interest. There are frequently several predatory mite species present or available for introduction and it is difficult to tell whether a single species or combination of species should provide the most effective means of biological control. We used a simulation model to examine the interactions between predatory mites of two families, the Stigmaeidae and Phytoseiidae, representatives of which feed on phytophagous apple mites. To identify key differences in predatory behavior and life history, various stigmaeid parameters were substituted with those of phytoseiids, and changes in the efficacy of either stigmaeids alone or in combination with phytoseiids were evaluated graphically. At low prey densities stigmaeids held an advantage over phytoseiids in terms of efficacy because of their higher preference for prey eggs, higher oviposition relative to prey consumption and the ability to consume their own eggs, while at high prey densities the higher maximum predation rate of phytoseiids gave them a higher efficacy. Thus the weaker predator (the stigmaeid) is the more effective competitor at low prey densities. The model did not account for dispersal, but since stigmaeids are the weaker dispersers, the possibility of developing stability in this system is much greater than if phytoseiids were the better competitors. A combination of stigmaeids and phytoseiids was shown to have greater efficacy than either predator alone over a wide range of prey densities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amano, H. and Chant, D.A., 1978. Some factors affecting reproduction and sex ratios in two species of predacious mites,Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot andAmblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool., 55: 1978–1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amano, H. and Chant, D.A., 1990. Species diversity and seasonal dynamics of Acari on abandoned apple trees in Southern Ontario, Canada. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 8: 71–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkett, L.P. and Forsythe, H.Y., Jr., 1980. Predaceous mites (Acari) associated with apple foliage in Maine. Can. Entomol., 112: 497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castagnoli, M. and Nannelli, R., 1987. Further observations on population trends of mites in a peach orchard-meadow in central Italy. Redia, 70: 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D.R. and Harmsen, R., 1990. Predatory behavior and prey-stage preferences of stigmaeid and phytoseiid mites and their potential compatibility in biological control., Can. Entomol., 122: 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D.R., Harmsen, R. and Clements, P.J., 1991. A mechanistic simulation to complement an empirical transition matrix model of acarine population dynamics. Ecol. Modelling, 59: 257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, B.A. and McGroarty, D.L., 1977. The role ofAmblyseius fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in Michigan apple orchards. Mich. State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep., 333, 22 pp.

  • Croft, B.A., MacRae, I.V. and Currans, K.G., 1992. Factors affecting biological control of apple mites by mixed populations ofMetaseiulus occidentalis andTyplodromus pyri. Exp. Appl., Acarol., 14: 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, M., Sabelis, M.W., de Jong, M. and Alers, M.P.T., 1988. Analysis of prey preference in phytoseiid mites by using an olfactometer, predation models and electrophoresis. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 5: 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, M., Sabelis, M.W., de Jong, M. and Alers, M.P.T., 1990. Do phytoseiid mites select the best prey species in terms of reproductive success? Exp. Appl. Acarol., 8: 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover, J.J., Croft, B.A., Welch, D.M. and Tummala, R.L., 1979. Biological control ofPanonychus ulmi (Acarina: Tetranychidae) byAmblyseius fallacis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on apple: a prey-predator model. Environ. Entomol., 8: 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunley, J.E. and Croft, B.A., 1990. Dispersal between and colonization of apple byMetaseiulus occidentalis andTyphlodromus pyri (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 10: 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M., 1986. Generalist and specialist natural enemies in insect predatory-prey interactions. J. Anim. Ecol., 55: 923–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, H.J. and Butler, K.P., 1973. Distribution of phytophagous and predacious mites on apple trees in Nova Scotia. Can. Entomol., 105: 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdsworth, R.P., Jr., 1972.Zetzellia mali andAgistemus fleschneri: Difference in spatial distribution. Environ. Entomol., 1: 532–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, S. C., 1969. Population studies of five mite species on apple trees in Washington. In: G.O. Evans (Editor), Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. Acarol., Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 117–133.

  • Kakehashi, M., Suzuki, Y. and Iwasa, Y., 1984. Niche overlap of parasitoids in host-parasitoid systems: Its consequence to single versus multipole introduction controversy in biological control. J. Appl. Ecol., 21: 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, J.A., Johnson, H.G. and Ball, M.H., 1984. Experiments to determine effects of predator releases on populations ofOligonychus punicae (Acarina: Tetranychidae) on avocado in California. Entomophaga, 29: 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royama, T., 1971. A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Res. Popul. Ecol. Suppl., 1: 1–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis, M.W., 1985. Predation on spider mites. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 103–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M.A., 1976. Evaluation ofZetzellia mali as a predator ofPanonychus ulmi andAculus schlechtendali. Environ. Entomol., 5: 187–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M.A., 1984. Effects of host plant on the predator-prey cycle ofZetzellia mali (Acari: Stigmaeidae) and its prey. Environ. Entomol., 13: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M.A., 1991. Searching behavior and associational response ofZetzellia mali (Acarina: Stigmaeidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 11: 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M.A. and J.E. Laing, 1985. Stigmaeid predators. In: W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (Editors), Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strapazzon, A. and Dalla Monta, L., 1988. Role and distribution ofAmblyseius andersoni Chant andZetzellia mali Ewing in apple orchards infested byAculus schlechtendali Nalepa. Redia, 71: 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickler, N.N., Cushing, M., Whalon, M.E. and Croft, B.A., 1987. Mite (Acari) species composition in Michigan apple orchards. Environ. Entomol., 17: 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takafuji, A. and Chant, D.A., 1976. Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their response to the density of their prey. Res. Popul. Ecol., 10: 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, A.L. and Chant, D.A., 1961. The practice and theory of biological control of insects in Canada. Can. J. Zool., 39: 697–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage, J.K. and Hassell, M.P., 1982. Parasitoids as biological control agents—A fundamental approach. Parasitology 84: 241–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, N.D.G. and Laing, J.E., 1977a. Some aspects of the biology and a laboratory life table of the acarine predatorZetzellia mali. Can. Entomol., 109: 1275–1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, N.D.G. and Laing, J.E., 1977b. Field observations ofZetzellia mali (Ewing) (Acarina: Stigmaeidae) in southern Ontario apple orchards. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ont., 108: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolhouse, M.E.J. and Harmsen, R., 1987a. A transition matrix model of seasonal changes in mite populations. Ecol. Modelling, 37: 167–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolhouse, M.E.J. and Harmsen, R., 1987b. A transition matrix model of the population dynamics of a two-prey-two-predator acarid complex. Ecol. Modelling, 39: 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, D.S. and Chant, D.A., 1989. Population growth and predation interference between two species of predatory phytoseiid mites (Carina: Phytoseiidae) in interactive systems. Oecologia, 80: 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, D.S. and Chant, D.A., 1990. Changes in body weight of two species of predatory mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) as a consequence of feeding in an interactive system. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 8: 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clements, D.R., Harmsen, R. Stigmaeid-phytoseiid interactions and the impact of natural enemy complexes on plant-inhabiting mites. Exp Appl Acarol 14, 327–341 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200571

Keywords

Navigation