Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element modeling within an integrated geometric modeling environment: Part II—Attribute specification, domain differences, and indirect element types

  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the second of a two part paper that addresses the integration of finite element modeling and geometric modeling. Instead of considering the integration of currently available systems, this paper addresses both modeling techniques in general terms and identifies the functions that are needed to integrate them, taking full advantage of the capabilities of both. A set of geometric communication operators are identified and defined for use in carrying out this integration process. Part I [1] considered the integration of geometric modeling and finite element mesh generation. This part considers the remaining areas of the specification of finite element analysis attribute information, accounting for domain differences between the geometric and finite element models and the generation of finite element models using element types that are of a lesser dimension than the geometric entity they represent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shephard, M.S. (1985) Finite element modeling within an integrated geometric modeling environment: Part I—Mesh generation. Eng. Comput. 1(2),

  2. Weiler, K. (1985) Edge-based data structures for solid modeling in curved surface environments. IEEE Comput. Graph. Applic. 5, 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parkinson, A. (1983) Feature recognition and parts classification in build. CAD Group Document No. 112. University of Cambridge, Engineering Dept., Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  4. Woo, T.C. (1982) Feature extraction by volume decomposition. In: Proc. Conf. CAD/CAM Technol. Mech. Eng. MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 76–94

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henderson, M.R. (1984) Extraction of feature information from three-dimensional CAD data. Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University

  6. Melosh, R.J.; Marcal, P.V.; Berke, L. (1978) Structural analysis consultant using artificial intelligence. In: Research in Computerized Structural Analysis and Synthesis. NASA Conf. Pub. 2059, pp. 175–189

  7. Shephard, M.S.; Yerry, M.A. (1985) Toward automated finite element modeling for the unification of engineering design and analysis. In: Unification of Finite Element Software Systems (ed. Kardestuncer, H.) Elsevier Science, N.Y. pp. 157–174

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gabel, R.; Ricks, R.G.; Magiso, H. (1981) Planning, creating, and documenting a NASTRAN finite element vibration model of a modern helicopter. NASA Cont. Rep. 165722

  9. Babuska, I.; de Arantes e Oliveria, E.R.; Zienkiewicz, O.C., Eds. (in press) Accuracy Estimates and Adaptive Refinements in Finite Element Computations. John Wiley, New York

  10. Dym, C.L. (1985) Expert systems: New approaches to computer-aided engineering. Eng. Comput. 1(1), p 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rehak, D.R.; Fenves, S.J. (1984) Expert systems in civil engineering, construction and construction robotics. DRC-12-18-84. Design Research Center, Carnegie-Mellon University

  12. Shephard, M.S.; Yehia, N.A.B.; Burd, G.S.; Weidner, T.J. (1985) Automatic crack propagation tracking. Comput. Struct. 20, 211–223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shephard, M.S. Finite element modeling within an integrated geometric modeling environment: Part II—Attribute specification, domain differences, and indirect element types. Engineering with Computers 1, 73–85 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200066

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01200066

Keywords

Navigation