Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of corporate entrepreneurship in Swedish industry—was Schumpeter wrong?

  • Published:
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the evolution and role of corporate entrepreneurship in Swedish industry, particularly for the 1945–1980 period, based on data on the 100 economically most important innovations during this period. Privately owned large corporations (Schumpeter Mark II) dominated in launching innovations in almost all industrial sectors and in all subperiods but decreasingly so. 20% of the innovations were launched by new firms (Schumpeter Mark I) but most of these new firms were spun-off and/or acquired by large corporations. State entrepreneurship was marginal. Universities played an important role, although sector-specific. New firms and existing firms had similar growth rates and almost identical and short gestation times to international markets for their innovations. 80% of the corporate innovations were product renewals rather than product diversifications or process innovations. No evidence of an evolution from autonomous over corporate to state entrepreneurship, as hypothesized by Schumpeter, was found. Evolution of a dynamic coexistence of. these forms of entrepreneurship is hypothesized in this paper. The paper finally presents a model, synthesizing Schumpeter Mark I and II, for analyzing technological change and entrepreneurship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1988) Patterns of Industrial Innovation. In: Tushman ML, Moore WL (eds) Readings in the Management of Innovation. 2nd ed, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Alänge S, Granstrand O (1986) Autonomous, Corporate or State Entrepreneurship? The cases of Sweden and Tanzania. CIM Report, No. R 1986: 03, Dept. of Industrial Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Alänge S (1987) Acquisition of Capabilities through International Technology Transfer. Dept. of Industrial Management, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Alänge S, Scheinberg S (1988) Swedish Entrepreneurship in a Cross-Cultural Perspective. In: Kirchhoff BA et al. (eds) Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1988 Babson College, Wellesley, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannock G, Baxter RE and Davis E (1987) The Penguin Dictionary of Economics, 4th ed, Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson B (1988) Public Enterprises in Sweden—searching for a viable structure. Ann Public Co-operative Econ: 175–195

  • Dahmén E (1970) Entrepreneurial Activity and the Development of Swedish Industry, 1919–1939. Irwin, Homewood, Ill. (A Swedish version of this study was published in 1950, “Svensk Industriell Företagarverksamhet”)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G and Soete L (eds) (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1982) The Economics of Industrial Innovation. 2nd ed. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Clark J and Soete LG (1982) Unemployment and Technical Innovation A study of long waves and economic development. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand O (1982) Technology, Management and Markets. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand O (1986) Measuring and Modelling Innovative New Entry in Swedish Industry. Paper prepared for the IUI-conference in Stockholm-Saltsjöbaden, August 29–31, 1983 on “The Dynamics of Decentralized (Market) Economies”. In: Day RH, Eliasson G (eds) The Dynamics of Market Economies. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand O, Sigurdson J (1985) Innovation Policies in East Asia and Some Implications for West Europe. In: Rothwell R, Langdon R (eds) Design for Innovation. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand O, Sjölander S and Alänge S (1989) Strategic technology management issues in Japanese manufacturing industry. Technol Analysis Strategic Manag 1: 259–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand O, Sjölander S (1990) The acquisition of technology and small firms by large firms. J Econ Behavior Organization 13: 367–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand O, Bohlin E, Oskarsson C and Sjöberg N (1992a) External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations. R&D Management 22: 111–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Granstrand O, Håkanson L and Sjölander S (1992b) Technology Management and International Business. Internationalization of R&D and Technology. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkanson L (1989) Forskning och Utveckling i Utlandet—en studie av svenska multinationella företag. (Research and Development Abroad—a study of Swedish multinational corporations). IVA-PM 1989:1, Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering. Stockholm (in Swedish with an English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekander P (1990) Industriella FoU-insatser i Sverige 1973 1989 en trend analys. CIM Report, No. R 1990: 02, Dept. of Industrial Management and Economics. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg (in Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B-Å (ed) (1992) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell AE (1961) Analysing Qualitative Data. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen DH, Wallmark JT (1988) Growth Patterns in Technical Innovations. In: Proceedings from European Foundation for Entrepreneurship Research, First Annual European Forum, IMEDE, Lausanne, December 8 9, 1988

  • Mowery DC (1990) The Growth of U.S. Industrial Research. Working Paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, Rosenberg N (1979) The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Res Policy 8: 102–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J Political Eco 67: 297–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (ed) (1994) National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Papachristodoulou C (1987) Inventions, Innovations and Economic Growth in Sweden: An appraisal of the Schumpeterian Theory. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Oeconomica Upsaliensia 12, Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelikan P (1990) Evolution of Structures, Schumpeter Efficiency, and a Limit to Socialist Economic Reforms. Working Paper No. 2, Stockholm Institute of Soviet and East European Economics, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell & Mott, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips A (1971) Technology and Market Structure. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips A (1980) Organizational factors in R&D and technological change: Market failure considerations. In: Sahal D (ed) Research, Development and Technical Innovation, Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N (1976) Perspectives on Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • SCB (1988) Nyföretagandet i Sverige 1986 och 1987—New Firms in Sweden 1986 and 1987. Statistiska Meddelanden, No. F 15 SM 8801, Central Bureau of Statistics Sweden, Stockholm (in Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard Economic Studies, vol XLVI. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (First published in German in 1912)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1976) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper Torchbooks, New York (first edition in 1942)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler GJ (1968) The Organization of Industry. Richard D Irwin Inc, Homeward, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback JM, Reitberger G (1982) Technology and Industrial Innovation in Sweden. A Study of New Technology-Based Firms. Report submitted to the National Swedish Board for Technical Development (STU), Stockholm

  • Wallmark T, McQueen D (1988) 100 Important Swedish Technical Innovations from 1945 to 1980. Studentlitteratur, Lund and Chartwell-Bratt, Bromley

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies. The Free Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter SG (1984) Schumpeterian Competition in alternative technological regimes. J Econ Behavior Organization 5: 287–320

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Granstrand, O., Alänge, S. The evolution of corporate entrepreneurship in Swedish industry—was Schumpeter wrong?. J Evol Econ 5, 133–156 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199854

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199854

Key words

JEL-classifications

Navigation