Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical properties of the glass fibre-polyester interphase

Part I Effects due to silanes

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single-fibre pull-out experiments have been carried out with glass fibres with and without silane coupling agents. Debonding was easiest when the fibre had a commercial coating on it which contained a silane and processing aids, and was relatively thick. Solvent extraction of the coating increased the bond strength, and total removal of it increased it still further. The strongest bonds were stronger than the polymer and probably failed by brittle fracture with a work of about 0.25 kJ m−2, much less than the estimated work of fracture of the polymer. After debonding, frictional sliding took place, with an interfacial pressure of 17 M Pa, and with a coefficient of friction that was influenced by the interface in the same way as was the bond strength, i.e. greatest for the bare fibre, and least for the coated fibre. The silane coupling agent plasticized the polyester, and it seems highly probable that debonding took place in the interphase, when the fibre was coated, so that frictional sliding during post-debond pull-out was between the chemisorbed layer of silane and the polymer. The physisorbed layer of silane probably dissolved in the polymer, because the friction was not affected by solvent extraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. W. Erickson andE. P. Plueddemann, in “Composite Materials”, Vol. 6, Interfaces in Polymer Matrix Composites edited by E. P. Plueddemann (Academic Press, New York, 1974) Chs 1 and 6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. T. Graf, J. L. Koenig andH. Ishida,J. Adhesion 16 (1983) 97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Harris, P. W. R. Beaumont andE. M. De Ferran,J. Mater. Sci. 6 (1971) 238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. Favre andJ. Perrin,ibid. 7 (1972) 1113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. J. Wadsworth andI. Spilling,Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 1 (1968) 1049.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Miller, P. Muri andL. Rebenfield,Comp. Sci. Tech. 28 (1987) 17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Mandell, D. H. Grande, T. H. Tsiang andF. J. McGarry, ASTM STP 893 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1986) p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. R. Piggott, in “Advances in Composites: Chemical and Physico Chemical Aspects”, edited by T. L. Vigo and B. Kinzig (VCH, New York, 1991) Ch. 9 in press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. S. Chua andM. R. Piggott,Comp. Sci. Tech. 22 (1985) 185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. R. Piggott andP. S. Chua,Ind. Eng. Chem Product RID 26 (1986) 672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. S. Chua andM. R. Piggott,Comp. Sci. Tech. 22 (1985) 107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Idem., ibid.22 (1985) 33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. R. Piggott,Comp. Sci. Tech. 42 (1991) 57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. E. P. Bowden, A. Moore andD. Tabor,J. Appl. Phys. 14 (1943) 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Gaur, B. Miller andD. E. Hirt,Comp. Sci. Tech. 42. (1991) 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chua, P.S., Dai, S.R. & Piggott, M.R. Mechanical properties of the glass fibre-polyester interphase. J Mater Sci 27, 913–918 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197641

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197641

Keywords

Navigation