Skip to main content
Log in

Zur darstellungstheoretischen Deutung von Kohomologiegruppen

  • Published:
Archiv der Mathematik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. I. N. Bernshtein andA. V. Zelevinski, Induced representations of the group GL(n) over ap-adic field. Functional Anal. Appl.10, 225–227 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Borel, AutomorphicL-functions. In: Proc. Symposia in Pure Math.33, part 2, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence R. I. 27–61 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Fröhlich, On fields of class two. Proc. London Math. Soc.4, 235–256 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. S. Gelbart andA. W. Knapp,L-indistinguishability andR-groups for the special linear group. Adv. in Math.43, 101–121 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K.Haberland, Galois cohomology of algebraic number fields. Berlin 1978.

  6. G. Henniart, La conjecture de Langlands locale pour GL(p). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I (3)299, 73–76 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.Jacquet, Representations des groupes linearesp-adiques. In: Theory of group representations and Fourier Analysis, C.I.M.E., 119–220 (1971).

  8. H. Jacquet, I. Piatetski-Shapiro andJ. Shalika, Automorphic forms on GL (3) I, II. Ann. of Math.109, 169–258 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Kazhdan, On lifting. In: Lie group representations II, LNM1041, 209–249, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Koch, Classification of the primitive representations of the Galois group of local fields. Invent. Math.40, 195–216 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. P. Labesse,L-indistinguishable representations and trace formula for SL(2). In: Lie groups and their representations, Adam Hilger LTD, 331–338, London 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. P. Labesse andR. P. Langlands,L-indistinguishability for SL(2). Canad. J. Math.31, 726–785 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. P. Langlands, On the notion of an automorphic representation. A supplement to the preceeeding paper, Proc. Symposia in Pure Math.33, part I, AMS, Providence R. I., 203–207 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.Opolka, Galoisdarstellungen und Galoiskohomologie von Zahlkörpern. Schriftenreihe des Math. Inst. d. Univ. Münster, 2. Ser.,27 (1983).

  15. H. Opolka, Extensions of number fields defined by cohomology groups. Nagoya Math. J.92, 179–186 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Scholz, Totale Normenreste, die keine Normen sind, als Erzeuger nichtabelscher Körpererweiterungen II. J. Reine Angew. Math.182, 217–234 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. P.Serre, Modular forms of weight one and Galois representations, In: A. Fröhlich (ed.): Algebraic number fields, 193–267, London 1977.

  18. E. W. Zink, Weil-Darstellungen und lokale Galoistheorie. Math. Nachr.92, 265–288 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. W. Zink, Lokale projektive Klassenkörpertheorie. Grundbegriffe und erste Resultate, Preprint R-Math-01/82, Akad. Wiss. DDR, Berlin 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. W. Zink, Lokale projektive Klassenkörpertheorie II. Math. Nachr.114, 123–150 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Shalika, The multiplicity on one theorem for GL(n). Ann. of Math.100, 171–193 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Opolka, H. Zur darstellungstheoretischen Deutung von Kohomologiegruppen. Arch. Math 46, 136–143 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197489

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197489

Navigation