Skip to main content
Log in

Crash worthiness design optimization using multipoint sequential linear programming

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A design optimization tool has been developed for the crash victim simulation software MADYMO. The crash worthiness optimization problem is characterized by a noisy behaviour of objective function and constraints. Additionally, objective function and constraint values follow from a computationally expensive numerical analysis. Sequential approximate optimization is used to deal with both the noisy functional behaviour and the high computational costs. By means of multipoint approximations, a sequence of linear programming problems is generated that can be easily solved. The optimization approach is illustrated for an analytical test problem and an industrial crash worthiness design problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afimawala, K.A.; Mayne, R.W. 1974: Optimum design of an impact absorber.J. Eng. Ind. 96, 124–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy, J.-F.M.; Haftka, R.T. 1993: Approximation concepts for optimum structural design — a review.Struct. Optim. 5, 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.A.; Park, G.J. 1995: Automotive occupant dynamics optimization.Shock and Vibration 2, 471–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosio, A.C.; Lupker, H.A. 1991: Design of experiments in occupant simulation.SAE Technical paper 910891

  • Etman, L.F.P.; Thijssen, E.J.R.W.; Schoofs, A.J.G.; van Campen, D.H. 1994: Optimization of multibody systems using sequential linear programming. In: Gilmore, B.J.; Hoeltzel, D.A.; Dutta, D.; Eschenauer, H.A. (eds.)Proc. ASME Advances in Design Automation (held in Minneapolis)DE-69-2, 525–530

  • Free, J.W.; Parkinson, A.R.; Bryce, G.R.; Balling, R.J. 1987: Approximation of computationally expensive and noisy functions for constrained nonlinear optimization.J. Mech. Trans. Auto. Des. 109, 528–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka, R.T.; Gürdal, Z. 1992:Elements of structural optimization, Dordrecht: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, W.N.; Khalil, T.B.; King, A.I. 1994: Literature review of head injury biomechanics.Int. J. Impact Engng. 15, 561–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoofs, A.J.G. 1987:Experimental design and structural optimization. Ph.D. Dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology

  • Schoofs, A.J.G.; Klink, M.B.M.; van Campen, D.H. 1992: Approximation of structural optimization problems by means of designed numerical experiments.Struct. Optim. 4, 206–212

    Google Scholar 

  • TNO 1994:MADYMO User's Manual, version 5.1. Delft: TNO Road-Vehicles Research Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Toropov, V.V.; Filatov, A.A.; Polynkin, A.A. 1993: Multiparameter structural optimization using FEM and multipoint approximations.Struct. Optim. 6, 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderplaats, G.N. 1979: Approximation concepts for numerical airfoil optimization.NASA technical paper 1370

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Etman, L.F.P., Adriaens, J.M.T.A., van Slagmaat, M.T.P. et al. Crash worthiness design optimization using multipoint sequential linear programming. Structural Optimization 12, 222–228 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197360

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197360

Keywords

Navigation