Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling method for representative elemental analysis of non-homogeneous coins

Gewinnung repräsentativer Proben zur Elementaranalyse nichthomogener Münzen

  • Published:
Microchimica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A microdrilling method and apparatus have been developed for the representative sampling of inhomogeneous ancient coins. By drilling through the cylindrical surface of coins a more average sample can be obtained than with surface sampling techniques. This drilling process leaves barely visible holes on the cylindrical surface of the coin, while the faces are unaffected. The technique has been successfully applied to 4th–5th century Roman bronze quadrantes. Preliminary analytical data, obtained by atomic-absorption spectroscopy, energy dispersive X-ray, and wet chemistry, show quite different compositions for the three coins analysed. Photomicrographic examination shows clear evidence of the inhomogeneity and the need for averaging sampling.

Zusammenfassung

Ein Verfahren wurde entwickelt, inhomogene alte Münzen zwecks Gewinnung repräsentativer Proben mit einem Mikroapparat anzubohren. Indem man die Münze an der zylindrischen Seitenfläche anbohrt, erhält man einen besseren Durchschnitt als Probe. So bleibt die ebene Fläche der Münze unversehrt und das Bohrloch kaum sichtbar. Römische Bronzequadranten aus dem 4.–5. Jahrhundert wurden mit Hilfe dieser Technik untersucht. Vorläufige Ergebnisse der Atomabsorptionsspektroskopie, der energiedispersiven Röntgentechnik, der nassen chemischen Untersuchung zeigen eine durchaus verschiedene Zusammensetzung dreier untersuchter Münzen. Die mikrophotographische Untersuchung erweist deutlich die Inhomogenität und damit die Notwendigkeit, Durchschnittsproben zu verwenden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. L. Barnes, W. R. Shields, T. J. Murphy, and R. H. Brill, in Archaeological Chemistry, C. W. Beck (Ed.), Washington DC: American Chemical Society. 1974. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. J. Hughes, M. R. Cowell, and P. T. Craddock, Archaeometry18, No. 1, 19 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Lyman (Ed.), Metals Handbook. Cleveland: American Society for Metals. 1948. p. 1204.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Lyman, 1. c, p. 1200.

  5. T. Lyman, 1. c, p. 896.

  6. P. Mayers, L. Van Zelst, and E. V. Sayre, in Archaeological Chemistry, C. W. Beck (Ed.). Washington DC: American Chemical Society. 1974. p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. R. Caley, in Art and Technology: A Symposium on Classical Bronzes, S. Doeringer, D. G. Mitten, and A. Steinberg (Eds.), Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1970. p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Gegus, in Die Römische Orgel von Aquincum, M. Kaba, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 1976. p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. A. Gordus and J. P. Gordus, in Archaeological Chemistry, C. W. Beck (Ed.), Washington DC: American Chemical Society. 1974. p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Meyers, L. Van Zelst, and E. V. Sayre, J. Radioanalyt. Chem.16, 67 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. J. Young, in Art and Technology: A Symposium on Classical Bronzes, S. Doeringer, D. G. Mitten, and A. Steinberg (Eds.), Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1970. p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Bakos and E. Gegus, Acta Archaeolog. Acad. Sci. Hung.31, 3 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. F. Gibbons, K. C. Ruhl, and L. S. Staikoff, in Archaeological Chemistry, C. W. Beck (Ed.), Washington DC: American Chemical Society. 1974. p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Simić, Arch. Iugosl.12, 55 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. F. Carter, in Archaeological Chemistry II, G. F. Carter (Ed.), Washington DC: American Chemical Society. 1978. pp. 348–350.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. S. Smith, in Art and Technology: A Symposium on Classical Bronzes, S. Doeringer, D. G. Mitten, and A. Steinberg (Eds.), Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1970. p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. A. Gordus and J. P. Gordus, in Archaeological Chemistry, C. W. Beck (Ed.), Washington DC: American Chemical Society. 1974. p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Catalog 88, p. 3. Garrett Industrial Supply Co., 550 Virginia Ave., Fort Washington, PA 19034, U. S. A.

  19. W. T. Chase, in Archaeological Chemistry, C. W. Beck (Ed.), Washington DC: American Chemical Society. 1974. p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Lechtman and A. Steinberg, in Art and Technology: A Symposium on Classical Bronzes, S. Doeringer, D. G. Mitten and A. Steinberg (Eds.), (Fig. 35). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1970. p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szonntagh, E.L. Sampling method for representative elemental analysis of non-homogeneous coins. Mikrochim Acta 75, 191–205 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01196389

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01196389

Keywords

Navigation