Skip to main content
Log in

A cognitive analysis of guilt over assertion

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated whether assertion and cognitive responses vary as a function of guilt over assertion. Eighty-seven women students were assessed for level of guilt over assertion, conceptualized as refusal. Low-guilt, moderate-guilt, and high-guilt groups were compared for assertive responses, frequency of self-statements hypothesized to be guiltrelated, and judgments of the impact of self-statements on assertion. It was predicted that the high-guilt group would be less assertive and would demonstrate a distinctive cognitive response pattern that could maintain guilty reaction. The results reflect considerable support for the hypotheses. The high-guilt group was significantly less assertive than the low-guilt group, and reported significantly more self-statements about harm to the other party and about their own personal responsibility than either the moderate-guilt or low-guilt group. The high-guilt group also judged the impact of the self-statement categories as significantly less helpful in facilitating refusal, compared to impact ratings by less guilty persons. The findings are related to cognitive-behavioral premises about maladaptive emotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Note

  • Klass, E. T.Development of a situation-specific scale of guilt. Manuscript in preparation, 1981.

References

  • Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A.Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1977. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Underwood, B., & Fromson, M. E. Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims.Journal of Research in Personality 1975,9 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. Resistance to improper dependency relationships.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1969,5 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. Reactance and the unwillingness to help others.Psychological Bulletin 1973,79 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, T. C., & Buss, A. H. Effects of justification for aggression and communication with the victim on postaggression dissonance.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1964,68 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. Self-statements and self-evaluation: A cognitive-response analysis of heterosocial anxiety.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1979,3 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J., Ross, M., & Insko, C. Attitude change and attitude attribution: Effects of incentive, choice, and consequences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1966,4 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsmith, J. M., & Gross, A. E. Some effects of guilt on compliance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,11 232–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craighead, W., Kimball, W., & Rehak, P. Mood changes, physiological responses, and self-statements during social rejection imagery.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1979,47 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, D., & Beach, L. R. On the decision to be assertive.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978,46 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. R., & Cooper, J. Role of intention and post-behavioral consequence in the arousal of cognitive dissonance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,23 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R., & Linehan, M. M. Basic issues in behavioral assessment. In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.),Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R., Linehan, M. M., & Smith, J. L. Reduction of test anxiety through cognitive restructuring.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978,46 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. L., & Krantz, S. Effect of success and failure on depressive cognitions.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1976,85 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslin, R., & Amo, M. F. Detailed test of the reinforcement-dissonance controversy in the counterattitudinal advocacy situation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,23 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Korgeski, G. P. Assessment and cognitive-behavioral interventions.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1979,3 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Williams, L., Pechacek, T. F., Graham, L. E., Shisslak, C., & Herzoff, N. Cognitive-behavioral and patient education interventions in cardiac catheterization procedures: The Palo Alto medical psychology project.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1979,47 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, E. T. Psychological effects of immoral actions: The experimental evidence.Psychological Bulletin 1978,85 756–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, E. T. Cognitive appraisal of transgression among sociopaths and normals.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1980,4 353–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, A. J., & Jakubowski, P.Responsible assertive behavior: Cognitive/behavioral procedures for trainers. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. Toward the assessment of social competence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978,46 453–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M., Goldfried, M. R., & Goldfried, A. P. Assertion therapy: Skill training or cognitive restructuring.Behavior Therapy 1979,10 372–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J.Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFall, R. M., & Lillesand, D. B. Behavior rehearsal with modeling and coaching in assertion training.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1971,77 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFall, R. M., & Twentyman, C. T. Four experiments on the relative contribution of rehearsal, modeling, and coaching to assertion training.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1973,81 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D.Cognitive-behavior modification. New York: Plenum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W.Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality.Psychological Review 1973,80 252–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. Distractions can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought description versus counter-effort justification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976,39 874–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizley, R. Depression and distortion in the attribution of causality.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1978,87 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. M., & Gottman, J. M. Toward a task analysis of assertive behavior.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1976,44 910–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B. F. Comparison of cognitive therapy and behavior therapy in the treatment of depression.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1977,45 543–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., & Sarason, I. G. Social anxiety and the evaluation of negative interpersonal feedback.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1975,43 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. L., & Fodor, I. G. Modifying assertive behavior in women: A comparison of three approaches.Behavior Therapy 1977,8 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is grateful to Robert Segal for his contributions to all phases of this project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klass, E.T. A cognitive analysis of guilt over assertion. Cogn Ther Res 5, 283–297 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193412

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193412

Keywords

Navigation