Skip to main content
Log in

Bitterness intensity of soybean protein hydrolysates—chemical and organoleptic characterization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soluble and isoelectric soluble soybean protein hydrolysates were prepared by Alcalase treatment to a degree of hydrolysis of 3–15%. The bitterness intensity of the hydrolysates obtained was assessed on a five-point scale. The average relative molecular masses of peptides in the soluble hydrolysates (2250-1400) and isoelectric soluble hydrolysates (1313-800) and their hydrophobic peptide fractions (575-400) were determined by the trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid method. The molecular mass distribution of peptides in soluble and isoelectric soluble soybean hydrolysates and their hydrophobic peptide fractions was determined by gel permeation HPLC using a Zorbax Bio Series GF-250 column. The results suggest that the main reason for the bitterness of soybean protein hydrolysates prepared by Alcalase treatment are hydrophobic bitter peptides of relative molecular mass less than 1000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagodawithana T (1993) Enzymes in food processing. Academic Press, San Diego, p 159

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bumberger E, Belitz HD (1993) Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 197: 14

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sohn KH, Lee HJ (1988) Korean J Food Sci Technol 20: 659

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fujimaki M, Yamashita M, Okazawa Y, Arai S (1970) J Food Sci 35: 215

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sohn KH, Lee HJ (1968) Agric Biol Chem 32: 794

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lovšin-Kukman I, Zelenik-Blatnik V, Abram V (1995) J Chromatogr A 704: 113

    Google Scholar 

  7. Adler-Nissen J (1986) Enzymatic hydrolysis of food proteins. Applied Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ishibashi N, Kouge K, Shinoda J, Kanehisa H, Okai H (1988) Agric Biol Chem 52: 819

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Charalambous (1988) Frontiers of flavor. Proceedings of the Fifth International Flavor Conference. Porto Karras, Chalkidiki, Greece, 1–3 July 1987. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 63–77

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ney KH (1978) Fette Seifen Anstrichm 8: 323

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lalasidis G, Sjoberg LB (1978) J Agric Food Chem 26: 742

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adler-Nissen J (1984) J Chem Technol Biotechnol 34B: 215

    Google Scholar 

  13. Przybyla AE (1989) Food Eng 61: 51

    Google Scholar 

  14. Umetsu H, Ichishima E (1988) J Jpn Soc Food Sci Technol 35: 440

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fujimaki M, Yamashita M, Arai S, Kato H (1970) Agric Biol Chem 34: 1325

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lemieux L, Amiot J (1989) J Chromatogr 473: 189

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freitas O, Padovan GJ, Vilela L, Dos Santos JE, Dutra de Oliveira JE, Greene LJ (1993) J Agric Food Chem 41: 1432

    Google Scholar 

  18. Visser S, Slangen CJ, Robben AJPM (1992) J Chromatogr 599: 205

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beresteijn ECH, Peeters RA, Kaper J, Meijer RJGM, Robben AJPM, Schmidt DG (1994) J Food Prot 57: 619

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barth HG (1982) Anal Biochem 124: 191

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wong TM, Carey CM, Lin SHC (1994) J Chromatogr A 680: 413

    Google Scholar 

  22. Adler-Nissen J (1979) J Agric Food Chem 27: 1256

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovšin-Kukman, I., Zelenik-Blatnik, M. & Abram, V. Bitterness intensity of soybean protein hydrolysates—chemical and organoleptic characterization. Z Lebensm Unters Forch 203, 272–276 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192877

Key words

Navigation