Skip to main content
Log in

Selective participation of brain-specific nonhistone Np-3.5 proteins of chromatin in the processes of the reproduction of a defensive habit in response to food in edible snails

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of brain-specific nonhistone Np-3.5 proteins of chromatin in the processes of the reproduction of a developed defense habit in response to food was studied in preliminarily trained edible snails. It was found that gamma globulins to Np-3.5 over the course of tens of minutes suppress behavioral and neuronal reactions elicited by a specific conditional stimulus, carrot juice, while not altering the reaction to a different conditional stimulus, apple juice. The gamma globulins to other nonhistone proteins of chromatin did not exert an influence on the reproduction of habits of food rejection. It is hypothesized that brain-specific nonhistone Np-3.5 proteins of chromatin are selectively involved in the molecular processes supporting the neurophysiological mechanisms of the extraction of information from long-term memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. I. P. Ashmarin and S. A. Titov, “Contemporary notions of the mechanisms of neurological memory,”Biol. Nauki, No. 3, 30–42 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Karavanov and B. N. Afanas'ev, “The nonhistone proteins of chromatin,”Molekulyar. Biologiya,17, No. 2, 213–233 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. I. Kniglikov, “Principal lines of research of the neurochemical mechanisms of learning and memory,”Zhurn. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat.,36, No. 2, 226–231 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Leninger,Principles of Biochemistry, Vol. 1 [Russsian translation], Mir, Moscow (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. A. Maksimov and P. M. Balaban,Neuronal Mechanisms of the Plasticity of Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. A. Mekhtiev, M. A. Gruden', and A. B. Poletaev, “The identification and isolation of glycoproteins and nuclear proteins of the bovine brain,”Biokhimiya,49, No. 12, 1959–1964 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. N. Sokolov, “Endoneuronal mechanisms of reinforcement,”Zhurn. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat.,37, No. 3, 403–407 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. V. Sherstnev, S. A. Kozyrev, and V. P. Nikitin, “Brain-specific regulatory proteins of chromatin in the organization of the functional system of the defense behavior of molluscs,” in:Summaries of Reports of the International Symposium “Integrative Activity of the Neuron: Molecular Bases” [in Russian], Moscow (1988), p. 136.

  9. H. P. Davis and L. R. Squire, “Protein synthesis and memory,”Psychol. Bull,96, No. 3, 518–558 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. J. Davis, J. Villet, D. Lee, M. Rigler, R. Gillette, and E. Prince, “Selective and differential avoidance learning in the feeding and withdrawal behaviora ofPleurobranchaea,”J. Comp. Physiol.,138, No. 1, 157–165 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Gelperin, J. J. Hopfiel, and D. W. Tank, “The logic of Limax learning,” in:Model Neural Networks and Behaviour, Vol. 24, Plenum Press, New York (1985), pp. 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. U. Gillette, J. A. London, and R. Gillette, “Motivation to feed affects acquisition of food avoidance conditioning inPleurobranchaea,”Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.,9, 914 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Goelet, V. F. Castellucci, S. Schacher, and E. R. Kandel, “The long and short of long-term memory — a molecular framework,”Nature,322, No. 6078, 419–422 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. L. Klein, J. Sullivan, A. Skorupa, and S. J. Agular, “Plasticity of neural receptors,”FASEB J.,3, No. 10, 2132–2140 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Makoto, N. S. Imamoto, and T. Uchida, “Monoclonal antibody against non-histone chromosomal protein high mobility group 1 co-migrates with high mobility group 1 into nucleus,”J. Biol. Chem.,261, No. 2, 1829–1834 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Polet, “Effects of fibroblastic growth factor on protein degradation in the migration of non-histone protein to the nucleus and DNA synthesis in diploid fibroblasts,”Exptl. Cell Res.,169, No. 1, 178–190 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. Serra and S. Giuffrida, “DNA-associated protein modifications involved in the regulation of gene expression in brain,”Ital. J. Biochem.,35, No. 2, 104A-116A (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Susswein, M. Schwarz, and E. Feldman, “Learned changes in feeding behaviora inAplysia in response to edible and inedible foods,”J. Neurosci. 6, No. 5, 1513–1527 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. G. Sutcliffe, “mRNA in the mammalian central nervous system,”Ann. Rev. Neurosci.,11, 157–198 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel'nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 323–332, March–April, 1991.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kozyrev, S.A., Nikitin, V.P. & Sherstnev, V.V. Selective participation of brain-specific nonhistone Np-3.5 proteins of chromatin in the processes of the reproduction of a defensive habit in response to food in edible snails. Neurosci Behav Physiol 22, 120–127 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192383

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192383

Keywords

Navigation