This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
F. W. Bauer, Some relations between shape constructions. Cahiers Topologie Géom. Différentielle19, 337–367 (1978).
F. W. Cathey, Strong shape theory. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle 1979.
T. A. Chapman, Lectures on Hilbert cube manifolds. Regional Conference Series in Math.28, Amer. Math. Soc. Providence 1976.
J.Dydak and J.Segal, Strong shape theory. Diss. Math.192 (1981).
D. A.Edwards and H. M.Hastings, Cech and Steenrod homotopy theories with applications to geometric topology. LNM542, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1976.
G.Gierz, K. H.Hofmann, K.Keimel, J. D.Lawson, M.Mislove and D, S.Scott, A compendium of continuous lattices. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1980.
Ju. T. Lisica andS. Mardešić, Coherent prohomotopy and a strong shape category of topological spaces. In: Proceedings Intern. Topol. Conf. Leningrad 1982, LNM1060, 164–173, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1984.
S.Mardešić and J.Segal, Shape Theory. Amsterdam 1982.
P. Mrozik, Chapman's complement theorem in shape theory: A version for the infinite product of lines. Arch. Math.42, 564–567 (1984).
P. Mrozik, Chapman's category isomorphism for arbitrary ARs. Fund. Math.125, 195–208 (1985).
L. C. Siebenmann, Chapman's classification of shapes: A proof using collapsing. Manuscripta Math.16, 373–384 (1975).
G. Venema, Embeddings of compacta with shape dimension in the trivial range. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.55, 443–448 (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mrozik, P. Some applications of lattice theory to shape theory. Arch. Math 47, 243–250 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192001
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192001