Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validating teaching competencies for graduate teaching assistants: A national study using the Delphi method

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study the Delphi Method was used to validate teaching competencies of graduate teaching assistants (TAs). Through the use of expert opinion, a panel of national leaders in teaching assistant support and training validated twenty six competencies as important in the preparation of teaching assistants. Feedback from panelists suggested that some instructional competencies depend on the specific responsibilities that are assigned to an individual TA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, B. B. (1968).Delphi process: A methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., Gamson, Z. F. & Barsi, L. M. (1987).Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. Racine, WI: Johnson Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, P. (1991). College teaching: what do we know about it?Innovative Higher Education, 16(1), 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyphert, F. R. & Grant, W. L. (1971). The Delphi technique: A case study.Phi Delta Kappan, 52 (5), 272–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, O. (1966).The use of the Delphi technique in problems of educational innovations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, O. & Rescher, N. H. (1960).On the epistemology of the inexact sciences, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D. & Brown, D. R. (1977). Validating science teaching competencies using the Delphi method.Science Education, 61 (2), 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. D. (1992). Some dimensions of effective teaching.Teaching at UGA. 11(1), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. T. (1971). The Delphi forecasting method,Phi Delta Kappan, 52 (5) 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Ronald D. Simpson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen S. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Ronald D. Simpson is Director of the Office of Instructional Development at The University of Georgia, where he also is professor of Higher Education and Science Education. He holds degrees from The University of Tennessee and The University of Georgia. Kathleen S. Smith is Coordinator of Teaching Assistant Support at The University of Georgia, Office of Instructional Development. She holds graduate degrees from The University of Georgia and has served as Administrative Coordinator and Acting Head of The University of Georgia's intensive English program. Her research and teaching focuses on the development and administrative support of teaching assistants with emphasis on International Teaching Assistants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simpson, R.D., Smith, K.S. Validating teaching competencies for graduate teaching assistants: A national study using the Delphi method. Innov High Educ 18, 133–146 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191891

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191891

Keywords

Search

Navigation