Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a palatable research paper experience

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recently expanding educational movement, writing across the curriculum, has encouraged instructors in all disciplines to require more undergraduate writing assignments, including research papers. A five-stage process for managing the research paper assignment is described. Students are instructed in gathering sources, organizing findings, and using a standard format. Progress is closely monitored at each stage with specific feedback. Student reaction to this technique was measured in upper-division courses using a 14-item questionnaire with Likert-type scaling and free-response narrative. Responses were overwhelmingly favorable, indicating that students would have less hesitancy and anxiety in completing future writing assignments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D. Y. (1982, June 9). Students need help in learning how to use the library.Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 56.

  • Behrens, L., & Rosen, L. (1987).Writing and reading across the curriculum (3rd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. M. (1985). Coordinated teaching of psychology and composition: A valuable strategy for students and instructors.Teaching of Psychology, 12, 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins-Knabe, B. (1987). Writing to learn while learning to write.Teaching of Psychology, 14, 239–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1990). Faculty resistance to writing-intensive courses.Teaching of Psychology, 17, 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966).Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, L. G., & Selby, J. W. (1979). Writing in psychology: A separate course?Teaching of Psychology, 6, 232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camplese, D. A., & Mayo, J. A. (1982). How to improve the quality of student writing: The colleague swap.Teaching of Psychology, 9, 122–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, E. T. (1987). An equitable method of assigning term papers.Teaching of Psychology, 14, 175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (1973).Writing without teachers. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulwiler, T., & Young, A. (Eds.) (1982).Language connections: Writing and reading across the curriculum, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, L. E. (1977). A relatively painless method of introduction to the psychological literature search.Teaching of Psychology, 4, 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. B. (1978). “Hunting” for psychological literature: A methodology for the introductory research course.Teaching of Psychology, 5, 100–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. P., & Goodkin, V. (1987).The consequences of writing: Enhancing learning in the disciplines. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, V. H. (1978). Course-related library instruction for psychology students.Teaching of Psychology, 5, 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1959).Language and thought of the child (trans, by M. Gabain). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poe, R. E. (1990). A strategy for improving literature reviews in psychology courses.Teaching of Psychology, 17, 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, P. (1982). Responding to writing: Peer critiques, teacher-student conferences, and essay evaluation. In Fulwiler, T., & Young, A. (Eds.),Language connections: Writing and reading across the curriculum (pp. 153–165). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwegler, R. A., & Shamoon, L. K. (1982). The aims and process of the research paper.College English, 44, 817–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, T. A., Cameron, S. M., Evans, R., & Nodine, B. F. (1980). Integrating writing into the teaching of psychology: An alternative to Calhoun and Selby.Teaching of Psychology, 7, 242–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1962).Thought and language (trans. by E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walvoord, B. E. (1982).Helping students write well: A guide for teachers in all disciplines. New York: Modern Language Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. B. (1990). Effective feedback on written assignments.Teaching of Psychology, 17, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A., & Fulwiler, T. (Eds.) (1986).Writing across the disciplines: Research into practice. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Kathryn K. Rileigh is Professor of Psychology at Pembroke State University. She holds a Ph.D. in psychology from Vanderbilt University. Her research interests include psycholinguistics and psychological interpretations of literature.

Copies of the annotated bibliography of handbooks on writing research papers may be obtained by writing Kathryn K. Rileigh, Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Pembroke State University, Pembroke, NC 28372.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rileigh, K.K. Toward a palatable research paper experience. Innov High Educ 18, 123–131 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191890

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191890

Keywords

Navigation