Abstract
In this study the Delphi Method was used to validate teaching competencies of faculty members in higher education. Through the use of expert opinion, a panel of national leaders in college-level teaching validated twenty seven competencies as important or very important for faculty members who teach. Seven other competencies were rated slightly below a mean score of 4.0 suggesting, based on additional feedback by the panel, that the importance of some competencies may depend on specific variables found within a given context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelo, T. A. (1994). From faculty development to academic development.American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 46(10) 3–7.
Angelo, T. A. and Cross, K. P. (1993).Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Brown, B. B. (1968).Delphi process: A methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
Centra, J. A. (1993).Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Chickering, A. W., Gamson, Z. F. & Barsi, L. M. (1987).Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. Racine, WI: Johnson Foundation.
Cross, P. (1991). College teaching: What do we know about it?Innovative Higher Education, 16(1), 7–25.
Cyphert, F. R. & Grant, W. L. (1971). The Delphi technique: A case study.Phi Delta Kappan, 52(5), 272–273.
Davis, J. R. (1993).Better teaching, more learning: Strategies for success in postsecondary settings. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
Feldman, K. A. (1994). Instructional dimensions.The teaching professor, 8(4), 3–4.
Helmer, O. (1966).The use of the Delphi technique in problems of educational innovations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
Helmer, O. & Rescher, N. H. (1960).On the epistemology of the inexact sciences, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
Hirschbuhl, J. J. & Faseyitan, S. O. (1994). Faculty uses of computers: Fears, facts and perceptions.T.H.E. Journal, 21(9), 64–65.
Simpson, R. D. & Brown, D. R. (1977). Validating science teaching competencies using the Delphi method.Science Education, 61(2), 209–219.
Simpson, R. D. (1992). Some dimensions of effective teaching.Teaching at UGA, 11(1), 1–2.
Simpson, R. D. & Smith, K. S. (1993). Validating teaching competencies for graduate teaching assistants: A national study using the Delphi Method.Innovative Higher Education, 18(2), 133–146.
Weaver, W. T. (1971). The Delphi forecasting method,Phi Delta Kappan, 52(5) 267–271.
Additional information
Kathleen S. Smith is Coordinator of Teaching Assistant Support at The University of Georgia, Office of Instructional Development. She holds graduate degrees from The University of Georgia and has served as Administrative Coordinator and Acting Head of The University of Georgia's intensive English program. Her research and teaching focus on the development and administrative support of teaching assistants with emphasis on International Teaching Assistants. Ronald D. Simpson is Director of the Office of Instructional Development at The University of Georgia, where he also is professor of Higher Education and Science Education. He holds degrees from The University of Tennessee and The University of Georgia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, K.S., Simpson, R.D. Validating teaching competencies for faculty members in higher education: A national study using the Delphi method. Innov High Educ 19, 223–234 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191221
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191221