Skip to main content
Log in

Collaborative learning activities in graduate courses

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structured collaborative learning activities undertaken in two graduate level classes are described. Student and instructor perspectives on these activities are explored based on data collected through interviews, open-ended evaluation instruments, and journals. Four perspectives on collaborative learning emerged from the data: (1) student expectations; (2) instructor tolerance for ambiguity and flexibility; (3) student reliance on authority; and, (4) evaluation of student learning. Suggestions for implementing collaborative groups in graduate courses are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, K. A. (1973). Collaborative learning: Some practical models.College English, 34(5), 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaboration, conversation, and reacculturation. In K. A. Bruffee (Ed.)Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (pp. 15–27). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbert, B., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1986). Cooperative learning, group-to-individual transfer, process gain, and the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies.Journal of Psychology, 120(3), 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991).Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, R. J. (1990).The Harvard assessment seminars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, J., Byrne, A. C., Quina, K. (1989). Collaborative learning: Notes from the field.College Teaching, 37(2), 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. J., & Shuttenberg, E. M. (1986). The desireable and the possible: Four instructional models.College Teaching, 34(1), 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Internalization of higher cognitive functions. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. & Trans.)Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, (pp. 52–57). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, H. S. (1986). Collaborative learning in the classroom: A Guide to Evaluation.College English, 48(1), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, E. R. (1987). Collaborative learning: Recognizing it when we see it.AAHE Bulletin, 40(2), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D. H., Nyquist, J. D., & Abbott, R. D. (1987). Students' perception of large classes. In M. E. Weimer (Ed.)Teaching Large Classes Well. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Julie A. Hughes Caplow is an Associate Professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis at the University of Missouri-Columbia. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in Higher Education Administration. Her areas of interest include postsecondary instructional strategies, faculty beliefs about teaching and knowledge, and postsecondary curricula. CarolAnne M. Kardash is an Associate Professor of Educational and Counseling Psychology at the University of Missouri-Columbia. She received her Ph.D. from Arizona State University in Educational Psychology. Her areas of interest include text processing, reading comprehension, and instructional and learning strategies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes Caplow, J.A., Kardash, C.M. Collaborative learning activities in graduate courses. Innov High Educ 19, 207–221 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191220

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191220

Keywords

Navigation