Abstract
This paper considers some implications for teaching in higher education of quality assurance demands made in circumstances of financial restraint. The paper suggests that responses must be anchored in improvement in student learning. This has implications for university teaching, for the evaluation of its effectiveness and for leadership in universities. The paper commences with a discussion of an understanding of the nature of the relationship between teaching and learning in higher education resulting from an Australian investigation of student perceptions of university teaching. The understanding arising from this study suggests that, given that the environment is an educational one, both evaluation of teaching and educational leadership should be in harmony with effective approaches to learning and teaching.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, G. (1978).Lecturing and explaining. London: Methuen.
Elbe, K. E. (1988).The craft of teaching. (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Linke, R. D. (1991).Report of the research group on performance indicators in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Margetson, D. (in press). Current educational reform and the significance of problembased learning.Studies in higher education.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluation of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues and directions for future research.International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 255–378.
Mathews, R. L., Brown, P. R., & Jackson, M. A. (1990).Accounting in higher education: report of the review of the accounting discipline in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Ramsden, P. (1990).Report to the higher education performance indicators project on the Course Experience Questionnaire trial. Wollongong: Center for Technology and Social Change.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire.Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129–150.
Ramsden, P. (1992).Learning to teach in higher education. New York: Routledge.
Ramsden, P. (1993a). What is good teaching in higher education? In P. T. Knight (Ed.),The audit and assessment of teaching quality. Birmingham: Standing Conference on Educational Development.
Ramsden, P. (1993b, April). Qualitative indicators of effectiveness in university teaching and learning. Keynote address at the inaugural conference of the Queensland Branch of the Higher education Research & Development Society of Australasia.
Sawyer, W. W. (1943).Mathematician's delight. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Tang, K. C. C. (1990, November). Cooperative learning and study approaches. Paper presented at 7th annual conference of the Hong Kong Educational Research Association, University of Hong Kong.
Additional information
Paul Ramsden is Professor of Higher Education and Director of the Griffith Institute for Higher Education at Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. He has taught in polytechnics, universities, and schools in the United Kingdom and Australia. His research field is the influence of teaching and assessment on the quality of student learning. Dr. Ramsden has been professionally involved in faculty development for over 15 years and published the textLearning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge, New York (1992). He holds degrees from the University of London and the UK Council for Academic Awards, and a Ph.D. from the University of Lancaster.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramsden, P. Current challenges to quality in higher education. Innov High Educ 18, 177–188 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191112
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191112