Skip to main content
Log in

Nurturing faculty vitality by matching institutional interventions with career-stage needs

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A questionnaire study, modeled after Baldwin's 1979 research on faculty at a liberal arts college, was conducted with 42 Lilly Teaching Fellows and Lilly Mentors at a large, public, research-oriented university in the Southeast U.S.A. Results from the study support the notion that one of the keys to a successful instructional and faculty development program is to target activities to the academic career stage of the faculty member.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A.W., Korn, W.S., & Dey, E.L. (1991).The American college teacher: National norms for the 1989–90 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.G. (1979). Adult and career development: What are the implications for faculty?Current Issues in Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.G. (1984). The changing development needs of an aging professoriate. In C.M.N. Mehrotra (Ed.),New directions for teaching and learning: Teaching and aging No. 19 (pp. 45–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.G. (Ed.). (1985).New directions for higher learning: Incentives for faculty vitality, No. 51. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.G. (1990a). Faculty career stages and implications for professional development. In J. H. Schuster, D. W. Wheeler, & Associates,Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal (pp. 20–40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.G. (1990b). Faculty vitality beyond the research university: Extending a contextual concept.The Journal of Higher Education, 61(2), 160–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.G., & Blackburn, R.T. (1981). The academic career as a development process: Implications for higher education.Journal of Higher Education, 52(6), 598–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.G., & Blackburn, R.T. (Eds.). (1983).New directions for institutional research: College faculty: Versatile human resources in a period of constraint, No. 40. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W.H. & Phillips, S.R. (1975). Components of an effective faculty development program.Journal of Higher Education, 46(2), 177–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R.T. (1985). Faculty career development: Theory and practice. In, S.M. Clark & D.R. Lewis (Eds.),Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education (pp. 55–85). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, C.J. & Schmitz, C.C. (1990). An overview of research on faculty and institutional vitality. In J.H. Schuster, D.W. Wheeler, & Associates (Eds.),Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal (pp. 41–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1992a). Lessons learned about mentoring. In M.D. Sorcinelli and A.E. Austin (Eds.),New directions for teaching and learning: Developing new and junior faculty, No. 50 (pp. 51–62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1992b).The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R., & Schuster, J.H. (1986).American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E.L. (1987).College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E.L. (1990).Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J.A. (1985). Maintaining faculty vitality through faculty development. In, S. M. Clark & D. R. Lewis (Eds.).Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education (pp. 141–156). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1987).The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. A Carnegie Foundation Special Report. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B.R. (1993). Faculty: Differentiation and dispersion. In A. Levine (Ed.).Higher learning in America: 1980–2000 (pp. 163–178). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S.M., & Corcoran, M. (1985). Individual and organizational contributions to faculty vitality: An institutional case study. In, S.M. Clark & D.R. Lewis (Eds.),Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education (pp. 112–138). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S.M., & Corcoran, M.E. (1989). Faculty renewal and change. In G.G. Lozier & M. J. Dooris (Eds.),New directions for institutional research: Managing faculty resources, No. 63 (pp. 19–31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S.M., & Lewis, D.R. (Eds.). (1985).Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, C.S. & Murrell, P.H. (1984). Developmental theory as a guide for maintaining the vitality of college faculty. In, C.M.N. Mehrotra (Ed.),New directions for teaching and learning: Teaching and aging, No. 19 (pp. 29–44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, M., & Clark, S.M. (1983, May).Professional socialization and contemporary career attitudes of three faculty generations. Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Minneapolis: Minnesota University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 597).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, P.F., & Simpson, R. D. (1989). Investing in junior faculty: The teaching improvement program (TIPs).Innovative Higher Education, 13(2), 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eble, K.E., & McKeachie, W.J. (1985).Improving undergraduate education through faculty development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, R. (1981). The need to rethink faculty careers. In R. Baldwin (Ed.).Expanding faculty options: Career development projects at colleges and universities (pp. 1–4). Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furniss, W.T. (1981).Reshaping faculty careers. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J.G. (1975).Toward faculty renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J.W. (1981).Self-Renewal: The individual and the innovative society (rev. ed.). New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooler, D.D. (1991).Professorial vitality: A critical issue in higher education. DeKalb, IL: LEPS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, D.K. (1991).Junior faculty development A handbook. New York, NY: The Modern Language Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J.H. (1985). Developmental needs as intrinsic incentives. In R.G. Baldwin (Ed.),New directions for higher education: Incentives for faculty vitality, No. 51 (pp. 59–68). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J.H., & Blackburn, R.T. (1984, April).Faculty careers: Maturation, demographic, and historical effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Lawrence, J.H., & Blackburn, R.T. (1985). Faculty careers: Maturation, demographic, and historical effects.Research in Higher Education, 22(2), 135–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J.H. & Blackburn, R.T. (1988). Age as a predictor of faculty productivity: Three conceptual approaches.Journal of Higher Education, 59(1), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, C. (1984).Vitality without mobility: The faculty opportunities audit. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J.H. (1990). The need for fresh approaches to faculty renewal. In J.H. Schuster, D.W. Wheeler, & Associates.Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal (pp. 3–19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J.H., & Wheeler, D.W., and Associates. (1990).Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R.D., & Jackson, W.K. (1990). A multidimensional approach to faculty vitality: The University of Georgia. In J.H. Schuster, D.W. Wheeler, & Associates,Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal (pp. 167–187). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M.D., & Austin, A.E. (Eds.). (1992).New directions for teaching and learning: Developing new and junior faculty, No. 50. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toombs, W. (1983). Faculty development: The institutional side. In R.G. Baldwin & R.T. Blackburn (Eds.),New directions for institutional research: College faculty: Versatile human resources in a period of constraint, No. 40 (pp. 85–94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Patricia Kalivoda works in the Office of Instructional Development at The University of Georgia. She holds an MBA and an Ed.D. from The University of Georgia. Her research focuses on faculty career development and faculty vitality. Geraldine Rogers Sorrell is Special Populations Coordinator at Middle Georgia Technical Institute. She holds an M.Ed.and an Ed.D. from The University of Georgia. She specializes in faculty and staff development, and career counseling. Ronald D. Simpson is Director of the Office of Instructional Development at The University of Georgia, where he also is professor of Higher Education and Science Education. He holds degrees from The University of Tennessee and The University of Georgia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalivoda, P., Sorrell, G.R. & Simpson, R.D. Nurturing faculty vitality by matching institutional interventions with career-stage needs. Innov High Educ 18, 255–272 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191048

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01191048

Keywords

Navigation