This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Andrews, K. R. A concept of corporate strategy. Remarks presented at the 11th annual international meeting of the Institute of Management Sciences, Pittsburgh, Mar. 13, 1964.
Anthony, R. N.Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. Boston: Harvard University, 1965.
Argyris, C. Essay review:Beyond freedom and dignity. Harvard Educational Review, 1971,41(4).
Bauman, Z. The limitations of perfect planning. In B. M. Gross (Ed.),Action under planning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Blau, P. M.The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955.
Buckley, W.Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.
Carlson, J. W. The status and next steps for planning, programming, and budgeting. In Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States,The analysis and evaluation of public expenditures: The PPB system, 2 (IV). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
Carpenter, M. M., & Rapp, M. L. The analysis of effectiveness. In S. A. Haggart (Ed.),Program budgeting for school district planning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications, 1972.
Curtis, W. H.Educational resources management system. Chicago: Research Corporation of the Association of School Business Officials, 1971.
[ERAS.] Educational Resources Allocation System Task Force.The development of an educational resources allocation system in pilot projects: An evaluation. Toronto: Ministry of Education, Ontario, 1975. (a)
[ERAS.] Educational Resources Allocation System Task Force.Systematic decision-making in education: A planning guidebook. Toronto: Ministry of Education, Ontario, 1975. (b)
Freeman, M. A. Project design and evaluation with multiple objectives. In Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States,The analysis and evaluation of public expenditures: The PPB system, 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
Gouldner, A. W. Organizational analysis. In R. K. Merton et al.,Sociology today: Problems and prospects, II. New York: Harper & Row, 1959.
Hartley, H. J.Educational planning, programming, budgeting: A systems approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
Hawaii. Department of Education. Master plan for public education in Hawaii. 1969.
Hills, R. J.Toward a science of organization. Eugene: University of Oregon, 1968.
James, W. L. G. Program budgeting — hope or hoax?Education Canada, 1972,12 (4), 28–33.
Jantsch, E. Integrative planning of technology. In E. Jantsch (Ed.),Perspectives of planning. Paris: OECD, 1968.
Kirst, M. W. The rise and fall of PPBS in California.Phi Delta Kappan, 1975,56(8), 535–538.
MacDonald, I. L. Planning for implementation: Variables of implementation and participant reactions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, 1974.
Mann, D.Policy decision-making in education: An introduction to calculation and control. New York: Teachers College Press, 1975.
Mouzelis, N.Organization and bureaucracy: An analysis of modern theories. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.
Moynihan, D. P. Eliteland.Psychology Today, Sept. 1970, pp.67–68.
Ozbekhan, H. Toward a general theory of planning. In E. Jantsch (Ed.),Perspectives of planning. Paris: OECD, 1968.
Quade, E. S.Analysis for military decisions. Chicago, 1964.
Ristau, R. A. DPE research-award study.Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1972,14(3), 1–14.
Schelling, T. C. Economics and operations research: A symposium. V. Comment.Review of Economics and Statistics, Aug. 1958.
Schick, A.Budget innovation in the states. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1971.
Schick, A. A death in the bureaucracy: The demise of federal PPB.Public Administration Review, Mar.–Apr. 1973, 146–156.
Schultze, C. L.The politics and economics of public spending. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1968.
Simon, R. I., & Levin, M. A. The irrationality of rationalized program development.Interchange, 1973,4(4), 63–73.
Smithies, A. Conceptual framework for the program budget. In D. Novick (Ed.),Program budgeting. Rand Corporation, 1965.
[SLFP.] State-Local Finances Project. PPB pilot project reports from the participating 5 states, 5 counties, and 5 cities. Washington, D.C: SLFP, George Washington University, 1969.
Steiner, P. O. The public sector and the public interest. In Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States,The analysis and evaluation of public expenditures: The PPB system, 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
[USGAC.] U.S. General Accounting Office. Glossary for systems analysis and planning-programming-budgeting. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
Van Geel, T. PPBES and district resource allocation.Administrators Notebook, 1973,22(1), 1–4.
Vickers, G.Value systems and social process. Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin, 1968.
Weiss, E. PPBS in education.Journal of General Education, 1973,25(1), 17–27.
Wildavsky, A. The political economy of efficiency.Public Administration Review. 1966,26(4).
Wildavsky, A. Rescuing policy analysis from PPB. In Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States,The analysis and evaluation of public expenditures: The PPB system, 3. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
Worner, R. B. PPBS and the derivation of cost effectiveness.AEDS Journal, 1973,7(1), 22–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nevas, S.R. Analytic planning in education: Critical perspectives. Interchange 8, 13–42 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189291
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189291