Skip to main content
Log in

On frame-indifference and form-invariance in constitutive theory

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this paper is to present an alternative formulation of the principles of Euclidean frame-indifference and indifference with respect to superimposed rigid body motions, i.e., rotations and translations. This is accomplished on the basis of the action of the proper Euclidean group on constitutive relationsinduced by the action of this group on the Euclidean tensors appearing in these relations. The resulting formulation of these concepts can then be used to show that the usual concept of material frame-indifference actually consists of twoindependent concepts, i.e., Euclidean frame-indifference andform-invariance, the latter being generally overlooked as an independent concept. On this basis, one can in addition show that any two of the concepts of Euclidean frame-indifference, form-invariance, and indifference with respect to superimposed rigid body motions, automatically implies the third. As an application of this formulation, we discuss the constitutive relations for a simple (elastic) material and a kinetic gas. In this context, it follows straighforwardly that the latter satisfy Euclidean frame-indifference, as shown by Murdoch [1], but not indifference with respect to superimposed rigid body motion, as shown by Müller [2]. As such, the current formation yields immediately that these are not form-invariant, and so not material frame-indifferent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murdoch, A. I.: On material frame-indifference, intrinsic spin, and certain constitutive relations motivated by the kinetic theory of gases. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.85, 185–194 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Müller, I.: On the frame-dependence of stress and heat flux. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.45, 241–250 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Truesdell, C. A., Noll, W.: The non-linear field theories of mechanics, 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo: Springer 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rivlin, R. S.: Introduction to non-linear continuum mechanics. In: Non-linear continuum theories in mechanics and physics and their applications (Rivlin, R. S. ed.), pp. 151–309. Rome: Edizione Cremonese 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ikenberry, E., Truesdell, C. A.: On the pressures and the flux of energy in a gas according to Maxwell's kinetic theory. J. Rat. Mech. Anal.5, 1–128 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krawietz, A.: Materialtheorie. Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo: Springer 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bertram, A.: Axiomatische Einführung in die Kontinuumsmechanik. Berlin: BI Wissenschaftsverlag 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, C. C., Truesdell, C. A.: Introduction to rational elasticity. Amsterdam: Noordhoff Publishers 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Truesdell, C. A.: Introduction to rational mechanics, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leigh, G.: Non-linear continuum mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bertram, A., Svendsen, B.: On material objectivity and reduced constitutive relations. Submitted to Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. (1998).

  12. Noll, W.: Euclidean geometry and Minkowskian chronometry. Am. Math. Mon.71, 129–144 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Noll, W.: Lectures on the foundations of continuum mechanics and thermodynamics. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.52, 62–92 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marsden, J. E., Hughes, T. J. R.: Mathematical theory of elasticity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall 1983

    Google Scholar 

  15. Appleby, P. G., Kadianaki, N.: A frame-independent description of the principles of classical mechanics. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal.95, 1–22 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dieudonné, J.: Treatise on analysis. Addison-Wesley 1972.

  17. Abraham, R., Marsden, J. E., Ratiu, T.: Manifolds, tensor analysis and applications. Applied Mathematics Series. Vol.75, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo. Springer 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sadiki, A., Hutter, K.: On the frame-dependence and form-invariance of the transport equations for the Reynolds stress tensor and the turbulent heat flux vector: its consequences on closure models in turbulence modelling. Cont. Mech. Thermodyn.8, 62–92 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svendsen, B., Bertram, A. On frame-indifference and form-invariance in constitutive theory. Acta Mechanica 132, 195–207 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186967

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186967

Keywords

Navigation