Skip to main content
Log in

Science and the limits of logic: A response to the Mahoney—DeMonbreun paper

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Conant, J. B.Two modes of thought: My encounters with science and education. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. Science and the world of imagination.Canadian Psychological Review 1975,16 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrove (Eds.),Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper & Row, Torchbook Edition, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H.Children's learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank Robert Alexander, Patricia Bowers, Roy Cameron, William and Hildred Davis, and Mark Zanna for stimulating my thinking and/or correcting my errors en route to the final draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowers, K.S. Science and the limits of logic: A response to the Mahoney—DeMonbreun paper. Cogn Ther Res 1, 239–246 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186797

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186797

Keywords

Navigation