Skip to main content
Log in

Dependence of defensive behavior of altricial nestlings upon alarm-signal parameters. Neuroethological approach

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    Pure tones corresponding to the maxima of SAS energy and repeated at a frequency of 0.8–4 per second evoke passively defensive behavior in nestlings.

  2. 2.

    The basis for the identification by nestlings of SAS and for differentiating it from the feeding signal is the tone frequency of bursts.

  3. 3.

    The signal repetition frequency performs a function connected with maintaining a defensive tonic activity throughout signal action.

  4. 4.

    The basis for maintaining defensive tonic activation is a specific level of trace excitability of auditory mechanisms retained for a fixed interval of time after the end of the action of the preceding burst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. P. K. Anokhin, Notes on the Physiology of Functional Systems [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. B. Golubeva, “Development of hearing in birds during ontogenesis,” in: Avian Sensory Systems and Brain [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1980), p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. P. Ovchinnikova, “Ontogenesis of defensive and feeding reactions in birds,” Vestn. Leningr. Univ.,15, No. 1, 30 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Tinbergen, Herring Gull's World, Harper-Row, New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. V. Tikhonov, “Acoustic signalization and behavior in precocial birds,” Dissertation for Candidate of Biological Sciences, Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow (1977), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. N. Khayutin and L. P. Dmitrieva, Organization of Natural Behavior in Nestlings [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. N. Khayutin and L. P. Dmitrieva, “Auditory evoked potentials and acoustically directed behavior in nestlings,” Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat.,32, No. 3, 520 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Curio, “The functional organization of anti-predator behaviour in the Pied Flycatcher: a study of avian visual perception,” Anim. Behav.,23, No. 1, 1 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Gottlieb, “On the acoustic basis of species identification in wood ducklings (Aix sponsa),” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,87, No. 6, 1038 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Gottlieb, “Development of species identification in ducklings,” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,93, No. 5, 831 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. H. Hess, Imprinting, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Konishi, “Development of auditory neuronal responses in avian embryos,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,70, No. 6, 1795 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H.-J. Leppelsack and M. Vogt, “Responses of auditory neurons in the forebrain of a song bird to stimulation with species-specific sounds,” J. Comp. Physiol.,107, 261 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. B. Miller, “Maternal vocal control of behavioral inhibition in mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynohos),” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.,94, No. 4, 606 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel'nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 251–258, March–April, 1984.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khayutin, S.N., Grinchenko, Y.V. & Dmitrieva, L.P. Dependence of defensive behavior of altricial nestlings upon alarm-signal parameters. Neuroethological approach. Neurosci Behav Physiol 16, 104–110 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186507

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186507

Keywords

Navigation