Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic importance and possible mechanism of a dynamic characteristic of the EEG in brain tumors

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Yu. V. Dubikaitis and V. V. Dubikaitis, Biofizika, No. 3, 345 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu. V. Dubikaitis and V. V. Dubikaitis, Biofizika, No. 1, 77 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Dubikaitis, Zh. Nevropat. Psikhiat., No. 8, 1167 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Dubikaitis, Zh. Nevropat. Psikhiat., No. 3, 371 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Dubikaitis, Zh. Nevropat. Psikhiat., No. 6, 826 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Hugelin and M. Bonvallet, J. Physiol. (Paris),49, 1171 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Grey Walter, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med.,30, 579 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Petit-Dutaillis et al., Rev. Neurol.,82, 501 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. E. Maiorchik, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., No. 4, 612 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. E. Maiorchik, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR, No. 3, 193 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. E. Maiorchik, B. G. Egorov, and N. A. Nikitin, in: Problems in Modern Neurosurgery [in Russian], No. 1, Moscow (1957), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O. Foerster and H. Altenbruger, Zh. Nervenkrank.,135, 277 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Grey Walter, Lancet,2, 305 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Schwartz and A. Kerr, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.,43, 547 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. A. Koreisha and V. E. Maiorchik, Vopr. Neirokhir, No. 2, 3 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. P. Bekhtereva, Biopotentials of the Cerebral Hemispheres in Supratentorial Tumors [in Russian], Leningrad (1960), p. 131.

  17. V. E. Maiorchik, Clinical Electrocorticography [in Russian], Moscow (1964), p. 87.

  18. G. Winokur, S. Trufant, et al., Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,2, 79 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. M. Meshcherskii, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., No. 1, 14 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Bures and O. Buresova, in: Electrographic Investigation of Higher Nervous Activity [in Russian], Moscow (1962), p. 332.

  21. D. Williams and G. Parsons-Smith, Brain,72, 450 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. P. Narikashvili, in: Current Problems in Electrophysiology of the Central Nervous System [in Russian], Moscow (1967), p. 181.

  23. V. V. Dubikaitis, Zh. Nevropat. Psikhiat., No. 6, 837 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. V. Dubikaitis, Zh. Nevropat. Psikhiat., No. 2, 180 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Nevropatologii i Psikhiatrii im. S. S. Korsakova, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 501–507, April, 1976.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubikaitis, V.V. Diagnostic importance and possible mechanism of a dynamic characteristic of the EEG in brain tumors. Neurosci Behav Physiol 7, 221–227 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186057

Keywords

Navigation