Skip to main content
Log in

A lower bound for sorting networks based on the shuffle permutation

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove an Ω(lg2 n/lg lgn) lower bound for the depth ofn-input sorting networks based on the shuffle permutation. The best previously known lower bound was the trivial Ω(lgn) bound, while the best upper bound is given by Batcher's Θ(lg2 n)-depth bitonic sorting network. The proof technique employed in the lower bound argument may be of independent interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Ajtai, J. Komlós, and E. Szemerédi. Sorting inc logn parallel steps.Combinatorica, 3:1–19, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. E. Batcher. Sorting networks and their applications.Proceedings of the AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference, vol. 32, pages 307–314, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. E. Cypher. A lower bound on the size of Shellsort sorting networks.SIAM Journal on Computing, 22:62–71, February 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. E. Cypher. Theoretical aspects of VLSI pin limitations.SIAM Journal on Computing, 22: 58–63, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. E. Knuth.The Art of Computer Programming, vol. 3. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. P. Kruskal and M. Snir. A unified theory of interconnection network structure.Theoretical Computer Science, 48:75–94, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. T. Leighton.Introduction to Parallel Algorithms and Architectures: Arrays, Trees and Hypercubes. Morgan-Kaufinann, San Mateo, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. T. Leighton and C. G. Plaxton. A (fairly) simple circuit that (usually) sorts.Proceedings of the 31st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 264–274, October 1990.

  9. N. Linial and M. Tarsi. Interpolation between bases and the shuffle exchange network.European Journal of Combinatorics, 10:29–39, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Parker. Notes on shuffle/exchange-type switching networks.IEEE Transactions on Computers, 29:213–222, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. S. Paterson. Improved sorting networks with O(logN) depth.Algorithmica, 5:75–92, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. G. Plaxton. A hypercubic sorting network with nearly logarithmic depth.Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 405–416, May 1992.

  13. C. G. Plaxton, B. Poonen, and T. Suel. Improved lower bounds for Shellsort.Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 226–235, October 1992.

  14. A. Varma and C. S. Raghavendra. Rearrangeability of multistage shuffle/exchange networks.IEEE Transactions on Communications, 36:1138–1147, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

C. G. Plaxton was supported by NSF Research Initiation Award CCR-9111591, and the Texas Advanced Research Program under Grant No. 003658-480. T. Suel was supported by the Texas Advanced Research Program under Grant No. 003658-480, and by an MCD Fellowship of the University of Texas at Austin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plaxton, C.G., Suel, T. A lower bound for sorting networks based on the shuffle permutation. Math. Systems Theory 27, 491–508 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184936

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184936

Keywords

Navigation