Skip to main content
Log in

Superlinear deterministic top-down tree transducers

  • Published:
Mathematical systems theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Denote byDT, l-DT, andnd-HOM the class of tree transformations induced by deterministic top-down tree transducers, linear deterministic top-down tree transducers, and nondeleting homomorphism tree transducers, respectively. In this paper the classsl-DT of tree transformations induced by superlinear deterministic top-down tree transducers is considered. Some basic properties ofsl-DT are shown. Among others, it is proved thatsl-DT is not closed under composition; thatl-DT—sl-DT + ≠ Ø withsl-DT + being the closure ofsl-DT under composition; and thatDT = nd-HOM o sl-DT, where o denotes the operation composition of two classes. Then the hierarchy {sl-DT n n> 1} is shown to be proper, meaning thatsl-DT nsl-DT n+1, forn≥ 1. Moreover, the same is proved for the hierarchy {t-sl-DT n n ≥ 1}, wheret-sl-DT is the subclass ofsl-DT induced by total deterministic superlinear top-down tree transducers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andre, Y., and Bossut, F., Decidability of equivalence for linear letter-to-letter top-down tree transducers, in:Proceedings of FCT '93 (Z. Ésik, ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 710, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993, pp. 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, B. S., Composition of top-down and bottom-up tree transductions,Inform, and Control,41 (1979), 186–213.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Burris, S., and Sankappanavar, H. P.,A Course in Universal Algebra, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Engelfriet, J., Bottom-up and top-down tree transformations—a comparison,Math. Systems Theory 9 (1975), 198–231.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Engelfriet, J., Three hierarchies of transducers,Math. Systems Theory 15 (1982), 95–125.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fülöp, Z., and Vágvölgyi, S., Results on compositions of deterministic root-to-frontier tree transformations,Acta Cybernet. 8 (1987), 49–61.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fülöp, Z., and Vágvölgyi, S., An infinite hierarchy of tree transformations in the class NDR,Acta Cybernet. 8 (1987), 153–168.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fülöp, Z., and Vágvölgyi, S., On domains of tree transducers,Bull. EATCS,34 (1988), 55–61.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fülöp, Z., and Vágvölgyi, S., Decidability of the inclusion in monoids generated by tree transformation classes, in:Tree Automata and Languages (M. Nivat and A. Podelski, eds.) Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 381–408.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Griffiths, T. V., The unsolvability of the equivalence problem for A-free nondeterministic generalized machines,J. Assoc. Comput. Mach.,15 (1968), 409–413.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Rounds, W. C., Mappings on grammars and trees,Math. Systems Theory 4 (1970), 257–287.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Vogler, H., Personal communication, 1992.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research of the first author was supported by Grant FOI 12852 of the Research Foundation of Hungary, and that of the second author was supported by Grant 2035 of the Research Foundation of Hungary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dányi, G., Fülöp, Z. Superlinear deterministic top-down tree transducers. Math. Systems Theory 29, 507–534 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184813

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01184813

Keywords

Navigation