Skip to main content
Log in

Reflection of decision making in cortical evoked activity

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The amplitude of the late positive potential (P300) to a visual stimulus is essentially increased at the vertex if informational value is attached to the stimulus with respect to making a decision concerning the choice of response. In the occipital region no such changes are observed.

  2. 2.

    In cases with decision making the amplitude of the P300 component is clearly greater at the vertex than in the occipital region.

  3. 3.

    No correlation was found between the latent periods of the P300 wave and the motor response to a visual stimulus.

  4. 4.

    The P300 component of AEP, in the writers' opinion, reflects not the process of decision making itself, but local cortical (nonspecific) activation, which is an essential element in the neural mechanisms of decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. É. A. Kostandov and Yu. L. Arzumanov, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,21, No. 4, 819 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. É. A. Kostandov and Yu. L. Arzumanov, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,23, No. 3, 523 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. É. A. Kostandov and E. G. Billing, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,23, No. 4, 938 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. É. A. Kostandov, T. N. Reshchikova, and G. S. Shostakovich, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,24, No. 6, (1974).

  5. A. R. Luria, Higher Cortical Functions in Man, Translated into English by B. Haigh, Basic Books, New York (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Grey Walter, The Living Brain, New York (1953).

  7. H. Davis, Science,145, 183 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Garcia-Austt and W. Bûno, in: Attention in Neurophysiology, Edited by C. R. Evans and T. B. Mullholland, London (1969), p. 258.

  9. E. Garcia-Austt, J. Bogacz and A. Vanzulli, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,17, No. 2, 136 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. W. R. Goff, in: Attention in Neurophysiology, edited by C. R. Evans and T. B. Mulholland, London (1969), p. 169.

  11. M. Haider, P. Spong, and D. B. Lindsley, Science,145, 180 (1964).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Hazemann, G. Audin, and F. Lille, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,39, No. 3, 247 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. H. H. Kornhuber and L. Deecke, Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol.,284, 1 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Lille, G. G. Audin and P. Hazemann, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,39, No. 3, 239 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Ritter, R. Simson and H. G. Vaughan, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,33, No. 6, 547 (1972).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J. M. Rohrbaugh, E. Donchin, and C. W. Eriksen, Perception and Psychophysics,15, No. 2, 368 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Spong, M. Haider, and D. B. Lindsley, Science,148, 395 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. K. C. Squires, S. A. Hillyard, and P. H. Lindsay, Perception and Psychophysics,14, No. 2, 265 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel'nosti im. I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 1123–1130, November–December, 1976.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kostandov, É.A., Vazhnova, T.N. Reflection of decision making in cortical evoked activity. Neurosci Behav Physiol 8, 354–359 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182916

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182916

Keywords

Navigation