Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of electrical stimulation of vagal nuclei in anesthetized and unanesthetized cats

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in the heart rate were studied during stimulation of the effector nuclei of the vagus nerves — the dorsal vagal nucleus and the nucleus ambiguus — in anesthetized and unanesthetized cats. If groups of neurons, stimulation of which in anesthetized cats causes slowing of the heart, were stimulated in unanesthetized cats under conditions of free behavior, the heart rate was increased. Pharmacologicalβ- adrenergic receptor blockade by injection of Obsidan or Inderal (propranolol) demonstrated the parasympathetic nature of these effects. The fact that that they are parasympathetic in nature was also confirmed by the character of the response: its short latent period and rapid disappearnce of the effect after removal of the stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. V. I. Ionavichute, G. E. Samonina, and M. G. Udel'nov, Usp. Fiziol. Nauk,3, 3 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. A. Smirnov, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,54, 1406 (1968).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. N. A. Sokolova, “Organization of parasympathetic inhibitory and acceleratory influences in extracardiac pathways and in the intracardiac nervous system,” Author's Abstract of Dissertation, Moscow (1974).

  4. M. G. Udel'nov, Nervous Regulation of the Heart [in Russian], Moscow State University, Moscow (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. G. Udel'nov, The Physiology of the Heart [in Russian], Moscow University Press, Moscow (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. M. Fedorov, N. K. Saradzhev, and N. A. Podrezova, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,60, 948 (1974).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. A. L. Berman, The Brain Stem of the Cat, Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. R. Calaresu and J. W. Pearce, J. Physiol. (London),176, 241 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Carson and B. M. Wenzel, J. Comp. Physiol.,87, 449 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Y. Chai, J. Y. Mu, and J. R. Brobeck, Am. J. Physiol.,209, 301 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. B. S. Cobb and H. M. Santer, J. Physiol. (London),230, 561 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. G. Gunn, G. Sevelius, M. J. Puiggari, and F. K. Myers, Am. J. Physiol.,214, 258 (1968).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R. L. Hamlin, W. W. Klepinger, K. W. Gilpin, and C. R. Smith, Am. J. Physiol.,222, 976 (1972).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. T. L. Iano, M. N. Levy, and M. H. Lee, Am. J. Physiol.,224, 997 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. T. Ponessa and C. N. Peiss, Federat. Proc.,26, 717 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. M. Scher and A. C. Young, Am. J. Physiol.,218, 780 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal SSSR imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 382–386, March, 1976.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dugin, S.F., Zakharov, S.I., Samonina, G.E. et al. Effects of electrical stimulation of vagal nuclei in anesthetized and unanesthetized cats. Neurosci Behav Physiol 8, 317–320 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182908

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182908

Keywords

Navigation