Skip to main content
Log in

Aspen bark photosynthesis and its significance to remote sensing and carbon budget estimates in the boreal ecosystem

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aspen bark was investigated for photosynthetic function, pigment content, and spectral characteristics during the 1993–1994 Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) summer field campaigns in the boreal zone of Saskatchewan, Canada. Parameters related to photosynthetic function were similar for bark and leaves: chlorophyll (Chl) concentration; fluorescence responses; and spectral reflectance. Similar increases along a vertical gradient from base to tree top were observed for incident photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), photosynthetic pigment content, photosynthetic capacity, and spectral reflectance variables. Since transmittance of aspen bark periderm was 20–30% in the blue, and 50–60% in the red Chl absorption bands, the PAR available to the photosynthetic cortical layer in the natural, canopy environment (<1000 μmol m−2 s−1) was sufficient to support positive net assimilation (<8–10 νmol CO2 m−2 s−1) under ideal conditions (e.g., light, temperature, saturating CO2), a rate approximately 30–50% that of leaves. However, the respiring tissues comprising the greater fraction of bark tissue bias the balance of CO2 exchange in favour of respiration for the whole bark. Therefore, net photosynthesis under ambient conditions on the whole bark was, in general, negative. The total bark surface area was estimated to contain 17–40% of the whole tree Chl. The contribution of the bark surface area fraction of the full canopy (leaves plus bark) increased with age (<60 years), with a similar trend expected for bark in total tree (and stand) photosynthesis. A spectral reflectance variable, the red edge inflection point (REIP), was related to total bark Chl content (r2=0.74). A better predictive relationship (r2=0.82) for total bark Chl was observed using a spectral index calculated from the reflectance ratio of two narrow wavebands (R3/R2: R2 and R3 are between 0.715–0.726 μm and 0.734–0.747 μm, respectively), which may have greater utility in landscape remote sensing. The bark spectra for Chlcontaining bark should improve understanding of carbon balance in aspen forests, based on landscape-level radiative transfer simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avery, T. E. and Burkhart, H. E.: 1983,Forest Measurements, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 331 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayman, A. and Schaedle, M.: 1982,Plant Physiol. 69, 911–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brayon, O. V.: 1973,Fluorescent Microscopy of Plant Cells and Tissues. Kiev, Russia 142 pp. [In Ukrainian.]

  • Covington, W. W.: 1975,Ecology 56, 715–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Canada: 1993,National Forestry Database Can. Council For. Mins., Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, K. C. and Schaedle, M.: 1978,For. Sci. 24, 569–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, S. J. and Prince, S. D.: 1995, Remote sensing of net primary production in boreal forest stands.Agric. For. Meteorol. (In press).

  • Gundersen, A.: 1954,Torrey Bot. Club B.81, 210–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiscox, J. D. and Israelstam, G. F.: 1979,Can. J. Bot. 57, 1332–1334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D. A.: 1940,Plant Microtechnique, New York, USA, McGraw-Hill, 523 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharouk, V. I. and Terskov, I. A.: 1982,Pigments in Tree Tissues, Nauka, Novosibirk, Russia, 88 pp. [In Russian.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, E. M., Sullivan, J. H., Chan, S. S., Bovard, B., DeLuca, A. and Cannon, T.: 15 pp. (Unpublished manuscript.)

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): 1994,Boreal-Ecosystem Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) Experimental Plan, V. 3.0 (May), Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, L. C. and Lawrence, D. B.: 1958a,Amer. J. Bot. 45, 383–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, L. C. and Lawrence, D. B.: 1958b,Minn. Acad. Sci. 25–26, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perala, D. A.: 1990,In:Silvics of North America, Hardwoods. Washington D.C., USA,2, pp. 555–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, B. N., Hoshizaki, T. and Miller, J. R.: 1988,Rem. Sensing Environ. 24, 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, B. N., Williams, D. L., Moss, D. M., Lauten, G. N. and Kim, M.: 1994,Rem. Sensing Environ. 47, 176–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanio, C.: 1860,Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 2, 39–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaedle, M. and Brayman, A.: 1986,Tree Physiol. 1, 53–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaedle, M. and Foote, K. C.: 1971,For. Sci. 17, 308–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. G.: 1907,Amer. Bot. 21, 327–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J., Field, C. B. and Hall, F. G.: 1992,Rem. Sensing. Environ. 42, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theisen, A. F. and Rock, B. N.: 1994,In: International Symposium on Spectral Sensing Research '94 (ISSSR), 10–15 July 1994, San Diego, USA, pp. 737–748.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kharouk, V.I., Middleton, E.M., Spencer, S.L. et al. Aspen bark photosynthesis and its significance to remote sensing and carbon budget estimates in the boreal ecosystem. Water Air Soil Pollut 82, 483–497 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182858

Keywords

Navigation