Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 82, Issue 1–2, pp 391–400 | Cite as

The aspen parkland in western Canada: A dry-climate analogue for the future boreal forest?

  • E. H. Hogg
  • P. A. Hurdle
Part III Advanced Technologies and the Impacts of Global Change

Abstract

Predicted future changes in regional climate under a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations were applied to the 1951–80 normals of 254 climate stations to examine future impacts on the boreal forest of western Canada. Previous analyses have indicated that in this region, the southern boreal forest is presently restricted to areas where annual precipitation (P) exceeds potential evapotranspiration (PET). The present analysis suggests that a predicted 11% increase in P would be insufficient to offset the increases in PET resulting from a predicted warming of 4–5°C. As a result, half of the western Canadian boreal forest could be exposed to a drier climate similar to the present aspen parkland zone (P < PET), where conifers are generally absent and aspen is restricted to patches of stunted trees interspersed with grassland. Future changes could result in permanent losses of forest cover following disturbance and an increase in the proportion of exposed edge habitat in remaining stands, where environmental conditions might induce additional stresses on tree growth. Thus if the predicted warming and drying occurs, productivity of aspen and other commercial species in the southern boreal forest would be greatly reduced.

Keywords

climate change drought evapotranspiration Populus tremuloides prairie-forest boundary 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boer, G. J., McFarlane, N. A. and Lazare, M.: 1992,J. Climate 5, 1045–1077.Google Scholar
  2. Bonan, G. B.: 1989,Ecol. Model. 45, 275–306.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, C., Campbell, I. D. and Hogg, E. H.: 1994,Geogr. Phys. Quatern. 48, 207–212.Google Scholar
  4. Ecoregions Working Group: 1989,Ecol. Land Classifi. Series No. 23, Sustainable Development Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service, Conservation and Protection, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 119 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Fisheries and Environment Canada: 1978,Hydrological Atlas of Canada, Surveys and Mapping Branch, Department Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Canada, 34 maps.Google Scholar
  6. Flannigan, M. D. and Van Wagner, C. E.: 1991,Can. J. For. Res. 21, 66–72.Google Scholar
  7. Gullett, D. W. and Skinner, W. R.: 1992,The State of Canada's Climate: Temperature Change in Canada 1895–1991, Environment Canada SOE Report No. 92-2, Dept. Supply and Services, Ottawa, Canada, 36 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Hirsch, K. G.: 1991,For. Chron. 67, 358–365.Google Scholar
  9. Hogg, E. H.: 1994,Can. J. For. Res. 24, 1835–1845.Google Scholar
  10. Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. and Ephraums, J. J. (eds.), 1990,Climate Change, The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 365 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Huang, S. and Titus, S.J.: 1992,Can. J. For. Res. 22, 1297–1304.Google Scholar
  12. Ives, W. G. H.: 1981,Environmental Factors Affecting 21 Forest Insect Defoliators in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, 1945–69. Can. For. Serv. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-233, Canadian Forestry Service, Edmonton, Canada, 142 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, M. E., Burman, R. D. and Allen, R. G. (eds.): 1990,Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Requirements, American Society of Civil Engineers, Man. Rep. Eng. Pract.70, Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., New York, USA 332 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Johnstone, W. D. and Peterson, E. B.: 1980,Above-Ground Component Weights in Alberta Populus Stands. Can. For. Serv. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-226, Canadian Forestry Service, Edmonton, Canada, 18 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Kerr, J. B. and McElroy, C. T.: 1993,Science 262, 1032–1033.Google Scholar
  16. Kirby, C. L., Bailey, W. S. and Gilmour, J. G.: 1957,The Growth and Yield of Aspen in Saskatchewan, Tech. Bull.3, Sask. Dep. Nat. Resour., For. Branch, Prince Albert, Canada, 67 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Long, S. P. and Hutchin, P. R.: 1981,Ecol. Appl. 1, 139–156.Google Scholar
  18. Looman, J.: 1979,Phytocoenologia 5, 347–366.Google Scholar
  19. MacDonald, G. M. and Ritchie, J. C.: 1986,New Phytol 103, 245–268.Google Scholar
  20. Maini, J. S.: 1968,In: Maini, J. S. and Cayford, J. H. (eds.),Growth and Utilization of Poplars in Canada, Publ. 1205, Dep. For. Rural Dev., Ottawa, Canada, pp. 20–69.Google Scholar
  21. Manabe, S., Spelman, M. J. and Stouffer, R. J.: 1992,J. Climate 5, 105–126.Google Scholar
  22. Peterson, E. B. and Peterson, N. M.: 1992,Ecology, Management, and Use of Aspen and Balsam Poplar in the Prairie Provinces, Canada, Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Special Report1, Edmonton, Canada, 252 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Price, D. T. and Apps, M. J.: 1995,Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 82, 203–214.Google Scholar
  24. Rowe, J. S. and Coupland, R. T.: 1984,Prairie Forum 9, 231–248.Google Scholar
  25. Schwarz, A. G. and Wein, R. W.: 1990,In: Smith, D. D. and Jacobs, C. A. (eds.), Proc. 12th North Am. Prairie Conf., 5–9 August 1990, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, USA, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, T. M., Leemans, R. and Shugart, H. H.: 1992,Clim. Change 21, 367–384.Google Scholar
  27. Vitt, D. H., Halsey, L. A. and Zoltai, S. C.: 1994,Arctic and Alpine Res. 26, 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. Yakimchuk, R. and Hoddinott, J.: 1994,Can. J. For. Res. 24, 1–8.Google Scholar
  29. Zoltai, S. C.: 1975,Southern Limit of Coniferous Trees on the Canadian Prairies, Can. For, Serv. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-128, Canadian Forestry Service, Edmonton, Canada, 12 pp. + maps.Google Scholar
  30. Zoltai, S. C., Singh T. and Apps, M. J.: 1991,In: Navratil, S. and Chapman, P. B. (eds.),Aspen Management for the 21st Century, Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 143–152.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. H. Hogg
    • 1
  • P. A. Hurdle
    • 1
  1. 1.Canadian Forest ServiceEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations