Skip to main content
Log in

Morphophysiological and biochemical evolution

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article describes the biochemical approaches to the natural system of organisms: the problem of “genotaxonomy,” i.e., the classification of organisms based on a study of the genome, and the problem of “molecular evolution,” based on a study of the amino acid sequence in homologous proteins of different organisms. It is emphasized that these areas of chemotaxonomy should not replace, but supplement classical taxonomy based on a study of morphological characteristics, on the data of comparative anatomy, embryology, and paleontology. Recent investigations show that it is not easy to connect and correlate evolutionary changes in morphological characteristics and changes in biochemical characteristics, for example, in the primary structure of proteins. In other words, these two processes are largely independent, as is shown, for example, by experiments on the hybridization of species of mammals, birds, and amphibians. Mammals evolved rapidly morphologically and physiologically and quickly lost the capacity for interspecific hybridization, although they frequently remained very similar in a biochemical respect (in structure of the proteins). Birds and amphibians, on the other hand, evolved much more slowly and retained the capacity for interspecific hybridization for a long time, even in the presence of very considerable differences in the amino acid composition and sequence of the proteins. It is suggested that the rapid morphological and functional evolution of mammals is connected with the rapid evolution of the regulatory region of their genome. On the other hand, the evolution of the structural genes (cistrons) that code peptides and proteins proceeded at the same uniform rate in different classes of vertebrates. This explains why in mammals, in contrast to amphibians and birds, often in the presence of considerable biochemical similarity, there are significant differences in morphological and functional characteristics and successful interspecific hybridization is impossible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. I. I. Ashmarin, Molecular Biology [in Russian], Meditsina, Leningrad (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A N. Belozerskii and B. M. Mednikov, Priroda,8, 9 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. S. Antonov, Usp. Sovrem. Biol.,77, 31 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. Britten and E. H. Davidson, Science,165, 348 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. M. Kreps, Vestn. Akad. Nauk SSSR, No. 5, 53 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. S. Popov, A. S. Antonov, B. M. Mednikov, and A. N. Belozerskii, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,211, 737 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. C. Redfield, Amer. Naturalist,70, 110 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. E. Dickerson, J. Molec. Evol.,1, 26 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. O. Dayhoff (editor). Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Vol. 4, National Biomedical Res. Foundation, Washington, D. C. (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Kreps, Zh. Évol. Biokhim. i Fiziol.,8, 222 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. F. Jacob and J. Monod, J. Molec. Biol.,3, 318 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. P. Georgiev, Usp. Sovrem. Genet.,3, 318 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Ohno, Nature,244, 259 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. C. Wilson, L. K. Maxson, and V. M. Sarich, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA,71, 2843 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Simpson, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.,87, 1 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. M. Prager and A. C. Wilson, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA,72, 200 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. C. King and A. C. Wilson, New Sci.,67, 16 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. B. Kolata, Science,189, 446 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Evolyutsionnoi Biokhimii i Fiziologii, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 493–502, November–December, 1976.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kreps, E.M. Morphophysiological and biochemical evolution. Neurosci Behav Physiol 9, 75–82 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182660

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182660

Keywords

Navigation