Skip to main content
Log in

A reexamination of the Nelson-Plosser data set using recursive and sequential tests

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper applies to the Nelson-Plosser data set the recursive, rolling, and sequential tests proposed by Banerjee, Lumsdaine and Stock (1992) for unit roots in the presence of mean or trend breaks. Unlike Perron's method, these three types of test endogenize the break point in the mean or trend and thus are more appealing in empirical studies. The (reverse) recursive test indicates rejection of the unit root null in industrial production and unemployment rate. The sequential test indicates that nominal GNP and common stock prices are stationary with a break in the mean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banerjee A, Dolado J, Galbraith JW (1990) Recursive tests for unit roots and structural breaks in long annual GNP series. Unpublished manuscript., Institute of Economics and Statistics, Oxford UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee A, Lumsdaine RL, Stock JH (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the unit root and trend-break hypotheses: Theory and international evidence. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:271–287

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christiano LJ (1992) Searching for a break in GNP. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:237–249

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:427–431

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson CR, Plosser CI (1982) Trends and random walk in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 10:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  6. Perron P (1988) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: Further evidence on a new approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12:297–332

    Google Scholar 

  7. Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis.Econometrica 57:1361–1401

    Google Scholar 

  8. Perron P (1990) Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. Memorandum 350, Princeton University, Econometric Research Program

  9. Rappoport P, Reichlin L (1989) Segmented trends and non-stationary time series. Economic Journal 99:168–177

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sims CA, Stock JH, Watson MW (1990) Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots. Econometrica 58:113–144

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:251–270

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Helpful comments from G. S. Maddala and two anonymous referees are greatly acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, H. A reexamination of the Nelson-Plosser data set using recursive and sequential tests. Empirical Economics 20, 501–518 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01180679

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01180679

Keywords

JEL Classification System-Numbers

Navigation