Skip to main content
Log in

Cointegration, common features, and persistence in U.S. farm output

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper determines the persistence of shocks to U.S. farm output at the sectoral and sub-sectoral level using a disaggregated vector autoregression framework. The persistence is measured under models that impose short-run common feature and long-run cointegration restrictions. The sub-sectoral outputs are found to have a relatively high degree of comovement in the short-run and a relatively low degree of comovement in the long-run. The common feature and cointegration restrictions are found to improve the precision of persistence and cross-persistence estimates. Subsectoral persistence shows considerable variation; persistence in Poultry & Eggs sub-sector is nearly three times the persistence in the Fruits & Nuts sub-sector. Two sub-sectors that share long-run common trends, Food Grains and Feed, Hay & Forage, also have significant cross-persistence, implying technological spillovers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blanchard OJ, Quah D (1989) The dynamics of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review 79:655–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau JC, Butault J-P (1992) Productivity gaps, price advantages, and competitiveness in E. C. agriculture. European Journal of Agricultural Economics 19:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Mankiw NG (1987) Are output fluctuations transitory? Quarterly Journal of Economics 102:857–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane JH (1988) How big is the random walk in GNP? Journal of Political Economy 96:893–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf SN (1989) Output persistence, economic structures and the choice of stabilization policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:69–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science 1:54–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Issler JV (1995) Estimating common sectoral cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 35:83–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Kozicki S (1993) Testing for common features. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 11:369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (1993) Comment. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 11:385–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu F, Antle JM (1993) Agricultural policy and productivity: International evidence. Review of Agricultural Economics 15:495–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard RG, Kashyap A (1992) Internal net worth and the investment process: An application to U.S. agriculture. Journal of Political Economy 100:506–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12:231–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1992) Determination of cointegration rank in the presence of a linear trend. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54:383–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop G (1992) Aggregate shocks and macroeconomic fluctuations: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7:395–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KC, Pesaran MH (1993) Persistence profiles and business cycle fluctuations in a disaggregated model for UK output growth. Paper presented at the Conference on Recent Developments and Implications of Aggregation Theory, Venice, Italy

  • Lutkepohl H and Reimers H-E (1992) Impulse response analysis of cointegrated systems. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 16:53–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Plosser CI (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: Some evidence and implications. Journal of Monetary Economics 10:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Orden D (1986) Agriculture, trade, and macroeconomics: The U.S. case. Journal of Policy Modeling 8:27–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwald-Lenum O (1992) A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54:461–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Pierse RG, Lee KC (1993) Persistence, cointegration and aggregation: A disaggregated analysis of output fluctuations in the U.S. economy.Journal of Econometrics 56:57–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsel GC and Ahn SK (1992) Vector autoregressive models with unit roots and reduced rank structure: Estimation, likelihood ratio test, and forecasting. Journal of Time Series Analysis 13:353–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh GE (1974) The exchange rate and U.S. agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (1992) Economic indicators of the farm sector: Production and efficiency statistics 1990 ECIFS 10-3, Washington, DC

  • Velu RP, Reinsel GC, Wichern DW (1986) Reduced rank models for multiple time series. Biometrika 73:105–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Variyam, J.N. Cointegration, common features, and persistence in U.S. farm output. Empirical Economics 21, 459–473 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01179867

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01179867

JEL Classification System-Numbers

Navigation