Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Assembly planning considers the product, process, and production system. The existence of constraints makes the assembly planning process difficult and time consuming. The planning degree of freedom (PDOF) for designers will be increased if the number of constraints is decreased on either the product or the other sides. A higher PDOF means that companies can be more flexible in responding rapidly to the assembly of parts. In this paper, a constraint ratio (CR) has been defined to measure the influence of the product constraints on assembly planning. Some rules have been established to simplify the evaluation procedures of the constraint ratio of the product. Examples are illustrated and explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Famos-Eureka Project EU 72, “Preliminary study report on European collaboration in the field of flexible automated assembly systems”, Department of Trade and Industry, London, 1987.

  2. G. Vasilash, “The best assembly is no assembly”,Production, pp. 54–56, March, 1994.

  3. A. Delchambre,CAD Method for Industrial Assembly, Wiley, UK, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Y. Charney,Reducing Product Lead time, SME, Michigan, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. C. Lin and T. C. Chang, “An integrated approach to automated assembly planning for three-dimensional mechanical products”,International Journal of Production Research,31(5), 1201–1227, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. K. Liu and I. S. Fan, “Integrated product definition model for electronics board level assembly process planning”,Proceedings, 12th International Conference on CAD/CAM Robotics and Factories of the Future, London, UK, pp. 884–889, August 1996.

  7. A. Delchambre,Computer-aided Assembly Planning, Chapman & Hall, London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Ben-Arieh and B. Kramer, “Computer-aided process planning for assembly: generation of assembly operations sequence”,International Journal of Production Research,32(3), pp. 643–656.

  9. Y. F. Huang and C. S. G. Lee, “Precedence knowledge in feature mating operation assembly planning”,Proceedings, International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 216–221, 1989.

  10. B. Frommherz and J. Hornberger, “Automatic generation of precedence graphs”,Proceedings, 13th International Symposium on Industrial Robotics, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 453–466, 1988.

  11. J. D. Wolter, “On the automatic generation of assembly plans”,Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 62–68, Scottsdale, Arizona, 1989.

  12. R. Gould,Graph Theory, Benjamin/Cummings, California, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. S. Homem de Hello, “Task sequence planning for robotic assembly”, PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. B. Boffey,Graph Theory in Operations Research, Macmillan, Hong Kong, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, Is., Liu, Ck. Constraint ratio in product assembly planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13, 401–406 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01179034

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01179034

Keywords

Navigation