Skip to main content

Schematic processes in pain perception

Cognitive Therapy and Research volume 17, pages 341–357 (1993)Cite this article

Abstract

Thirty-six subjects in a cold pressor experiment were asked to periodically rate the unpleasantness of the experience and estimate the water temperature, under three attention conditions. Subjects were given (1) instructions to monitor their sensations, (2) instructions to monitor their emotions, or (3) no monitoring instructions. With their hands immersed in the cold water, subjects had to learn and later recognize a list of words related in varying degrees to either the sensory or the emotional features of coldness. As predicted, subjects who monitored their sensations rated the experience as less unpleasant, but their estimates of the water temperature did not differ from the other two conditions. In addition, these subjects had a higher rate of “hits” and “false alarms” for words associated with the sensory features of coldness. These results are seen as providing tentative support for the parallel-processing model of pain perception and specifically, the hypothesis that pain reduction can result from a modification of a pain schema.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Ahles, T. A., Blanchard, E. B., & Leventhal, H. (1983). Cognitive control of pain: Attention to the sensory aspects of the cold pressor stimulus.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, T. X., & Hahn, K. W., Jr. (1962). Physiological and subjective responses to pain producing stimulation under hypnotically-suggested and waking-imagined “analgesia.”Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 65 411–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, B., & Dinnerstein, A. J. (1971). Role of attention focus in pain perception: Manipulation of response to noxious stimulation by instructions.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77 42–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, J. T. (1979). Scripts in text comprehension and memory.Cognitive Psychology, 11 177–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems in comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 34–52). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumptions of normality implied in the analysis of variance.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32 657–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracely, R. H., & Kwilosz, D. M. (1988). The descripto differential scale: Applying psychophysical principles to clinical pain assessment.Pain, 35 279–288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1970). Habituation: A dual-process theory.Psychological Review, 77 419–450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. E. (1973). Effects of accurate expectations about sensations on the sensory and distress components of pain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27 261–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, F. W., & Goldfoot, D. A. (1966). Self-control and tolerance of noxious stimulation.Psychological Reports, 18 79–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, E. A., Leventhal, H., Shacham, S., & Easterling, D. V. (1989). Active coping reduces reports of pain from childbirth.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57 365–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H., Brown, D., Shacham, S., & Engquist, G. (1979). Effects of preparatory information about sensations, threat of pain, and attention on cold pressor distress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 688–714.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H., & Everhart, D. (1980). Emotion, pain, and physical illness. In C. E. Izard (Ed.),Emotions and psychopathology (pp. 263–299). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, S., Bushnell, M. C., Molina-Negro, P., Martinez, S. N., & Duncan, G. H. (1991). The effects of dorsal column stimulation on measures of clinical and experimental pain in men.Pain, 45 249–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCaul, K. D., & Haugtvedt, C. (1982). Attention, distraction, and cold-pressor pain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 154–162.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R. (1975). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods.Pain, 1 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R., & Dennis, S. G. (1978). Neurophysiological foundations of pain. In R. A. Sternbach (Ed.),The psychology of pain (pp. 1–26). New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, D., Duncan, G. H., & Bushnell, M. C. (1989). Effects of attention on the intensity and unpleasantness of thermal pain.Pain, 39 345–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mower, G. D. (1976). Perceived intensity of peripheral thermal stimuli is independent of internal body temperature.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 90 1152–1155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. D., Barrell, J. J., & Gracely, R. H. (1980). A psychophysical analysis of experiential factors that selectively influence the affective dimension of pain.Pain, 8 137–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reading, A. E., Hand, D. J., & Sledmere, C. M. (1983). A comparison of response profiles obtained on the McGill Pain Questionnaire and an adjective checklist.Pain, 16 375–383.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Uranowitz, S. W. (1978). Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 941–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanos, N. P., Horton, C., & Chaves, J. F. (1975). The effect of two cognitive strategies on pain threshold.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84 677–681.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.),Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tearnan, B. H., & Dar, R. (1986). Physician ratings of pain descriptors: Potential diagnostic utility.Pain, 26 45–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology, 12 97–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University, 69978, Ramat Aviv, Israel

    Reuven Dar

  2. Rutgers University, USA

    Howard Leventhal

Authors
  1. Reuven Dar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Howard Leventhal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dar, R., Leventhal, H. Schematic processes in pain perception. Cogn Ther Res 17, 341–357 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01177659

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01177659

Key words

  • pain
  • perception
  • schema
  • sensory
  • emotional