Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 341–357 | Cite as

Schematic processes in pain perception

  • Reuven Dar
  • Howard Leventhal
Article

Abstract

Thirty-six subjects in a cold pressor experiment were asked to periodically rate the unpleasantness of the experience and estimate the water temperature, under three attention conditions. Subjects were given (1) instructions to monitor their sensations, (2) instructions to monitor their emotions, or (3) no monitoring instructions. With their hands immersed in the cold water, subjects had to learn and later recognize a list of words related in varying degrees to either the sensory or the emotional features of coldness. As predicted, subjects who monitored their sensations rated the experience as less unpleasant, but their estimates of the water temperature did not differ from the other two conditions. In addition, these subjects had a higher rate of “hits” and “false alarms” for words associated with the sensory features of coldness. These results are seen as providing tentative support for the parallel-processing model of pain perception and specifically, the hypothesis that pain reduction can result from a modification of a pain schema.

Key words

pain perception schema sensory emotional 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahles, T. A., Blanchard, E. B., & Leventhal, H. (1983). Cognitive control of pain: Attention to the sensory aspects of the cold pressor stimulus.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7 159–177.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, T. X., & Hahn, K. W., Jr. (1962). Physiological and subjective responses to pain producing stimulation under hypnotically-suggested and waking-imagined “analgesia.”Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 65 411–418.Google Scholar
  3. Blitz, B., & Dinnerstein, A. J. (1971). Role of attention focus in pain perception: Manipulation of response to noxious stimulation by instructions.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77 42–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, J. T. (1979). Scripts in text comprehension and memory.Cognitive Psychology, 11 177–220.Google Scholar
  5. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems in comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 383–438). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 34–52). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumptions of normality implied in the analysis of variance.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32 657–701.Google Scholar
  8. Gracely, R. H., & Kwilosz, D. M. (1988). The descripto differential scale: Applying psychophysical principles to clinical pain assessment.Pain, 35 279–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1970). Habituation: A dual-process theory.Psychological Review, 77 419–450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, J. E. (1973). Effects of accurate expectations about sensations on the sensory and distress components of pain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27 261–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanfer, F. W., & Goldfoot, D. A. (1966). Self-control and tolerance of noxious stimulation.Psychological Reports, 18 79–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Leventhal, E. A., Leventhal, H., Shacham, S., & Easterling, D. V. (1989). Active coping reduces reports of pain from childbirth.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57 365–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Leventhal, H., Brown, D., Shacham, S., & Engquist, G. (1979). Effects of preparatory information about sensations, threat of pain, and attention on cold pressor distress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 688–714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Leventhal, H., & Everhart, D. (1980). Emotion, pain, and physical illness. In C. E. Izard (Ed.),Emotions and psychopathology (pp. 263–299). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  15. Marchand, S., Bushnell, M. C., Molina-Negro, P., Martinez, S. N., & Duncan, G. H. (1991). The effects of dorsal column stimulation on measures of clinical and experimental pain in men.Pain, 45 249–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McCaul, K. D., & Haugtvedt, C. (1982). Attention, distraction, and cold-pressor pain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 154–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Melzack, R. (1975). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods.Pain, 1 277–299.Google Scholar
  18. Melzack, R., & Dennis, S. G. (1978). Neurophysiological foundations of pain. In R. A. Sternbach (Ed.),The psychology of pain (pp. 1–26). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  19. Miron, D., Duncan, G. H., & Bushnell, M. C. (1989). Effects of attention on the intensity and unpleasantness of thermal pain.Pain, 39 345–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mower, G. D. (1976). Perceived intensity of peripheral thermal stimuli is independent of internal body temperature.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 90 1152–1155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109 160–174.Google Scholar
  22. Price, D. D., Barrell, J. J., & Gracely, R. H. (1980). A psychophysical analysis of experiential factors that selectively influence the affective dimension of pain.Pain, 8 137–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Reading, A. E., Hand, D. J., & Sledmere, C. M. (1983). A comparison of response profiles obtained on the McGill Pain Questionnaire and an adjective checklist.Pain, 16 375–383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Snyder, M., & Uranowitz, S. W. (1978). Reconstructing the past: Some cognitive consequences of person perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 941–950.Google Scholar
  25. Spanos, N. P., Horton, C., & Chaves, J. F. (1975). The effect of two cognitive strategies on pain threshold.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84 677–681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.),Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Tearnan, B. H., & Dar, R. (1986). Physician ratings of pain descriptors: Potential diagnostic utility.Pain, 26 45–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology, 12 97–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reuven Dar
    • 1
  • Howard Leventhal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTel-Aviv UniversityRamat AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Rutgers UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations