Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive factors in computer anxiety

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent growth of computer technology has been accompanied by an increasing number of individuals who are anxious or intimidated by computers. The current study was designed to test a cognitive model of computer anxiety, where computer anxiety is seen as a function of internal dialogue, underlying meaning systems, behavioral acts, and behavioral outcomes when working on a computer. The Self-Statements About Computers (SSAC) checklist was empirically developed to assess thoughts or internal dialogue associated with anxiety and computer use, as well as the meaning of those thoughts for the individual. Analyses revealed that high computer-anxious subjects had lower expectations of performance and reported more debilitative thoughts during an actual computer task. They also reported higher levels of anxiety during this computer interaction, had more bodily sensations, and took longer to complete the task. In addition, high computer-anxious individuals reported less computer experience and mechanical interest, and higher levels of math anxiety. These results support the proposed cognitive model of computer anxiety and suggest directions for clinical intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahl, D. H. (1976). Survey of public attitudes toward computers in society. In D. H. Ahl (Ed.),The best of Creative Computing (Vol. 1, pp. 77–79). Morristown, NJ: Creative Computing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. E., Klassen, D. L., Hansen, T. P., & Johnson, D. C. (1980–1981). The affective and cognitive effects of microcomputer based science instruction.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 9 329–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnkoff, D. B., & Smith, R. J. (in press). Cognitive processes in test anxiety: An analysis of two assessment procedures in an actual test.Cognitive Therapy and Research.

  • Bruch, M. A., Juster, H. R., & Kaflowitz, N. G. (1983). Relationships of cognitive components of test anxiety to test performance: Implications for assessment and treatment.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30 527–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Glass, C. R., & Merluzzi, T. V. (1979). Self-statements and self-evaluations: A cognitive-response analysis of heterosocial anxiety.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coovert, M. D., & Goldstein, M. (1980). Locus of control as a predictor of users' attitudes toward computers.Psychological Reports, 47 1167–1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galassi, J. P., Frierson, H. T., & Sharer, R. (1981a). Behavior of high, moderate and low testanxious students during an actual test situation.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 51–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galassi, J. P., Frierson, H. T., & Sharer, R. (1981b). Concurrent versus retrospective assessment in test anxiety research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49 614–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, C. R., Knight, L. A., & Baggett, H. L. (1985). Bibliography on computer anxiety and psychological aspects of computer use.Psychological Documents, 15 25. (Ms. No. 2723)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R., & D'Zurilla, T. J. (1969). A behavioral-analytic model for assessing competence. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.),Current topics in clinical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 151–196). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gressard, C., & Loyd, B. H. (1984, April).An investigaton of the effects of math anxiety and sex on computer attitudes. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Heinssen, R. K., Jr., & Glass, C. R. (1986, November).Client-treatment matching in computer anxiety interventions. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago.

  • Heinssen, R. K., Jr., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1984, November).Assessment of computer anxiety: The dark side of the computer revolution. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Philadelphia.

  • Heinssen, R. K., Jr., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale.Computers in Human Behavior, 3 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollandsworth, J. G., Glazeski, R. C., Kirkland, K., Jones, G. E., & Van Norman, L. R. (1979). An analysis of the nature and effects of test anxiety: Cognitive, behavioral, and physiological components.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 3 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J. (1980). Terminal trauma.Creative Computing, March, p. 80.

  • Jay, T. (1985). Defining and measuring computerphobia. In R. E. Eberts & C. G. Eberts (Eds.),Trends in ergonomics/Human factors II (pp. 321–326). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. H. (1983). Sex differences in achievement on cognitive dimensions of computer literacy.Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 3620A. (University Microfilms No. DA8402875)

  • Jordan, E. W., & Stroup, D. F. (1982). The behavioral antecedents of computer fear.Journal of Data Education, 22 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C. (1984). Behavioral assessment and methodology. In G. T. Wilson, C. M. Franks, K. D. Brownell, & P. C. Kendall,Annual review of behavior therapy (Vol. 9, pp. 39–94). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Hollon, S. D. (1981). Assessing self-referent speech: Methods in the measurement of self-statements. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions (pp. 85–118). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Williams, L., Pechacek, T. F., Graham, L. E., Shisslak, C., & Herzof, N. (1979). Cognitive-behavioral and patient education interventions in cardiac catheterization procedures: The Palo Alto medical psychology project.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuder, G. F. (1934).Kuder Preference Record-Vocational. Chicago: Science Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D., & Butler, L. (1979). Cognitive ethology: Assessing the streams of cognition and emotion. In K. Blankstein, P. Pliner, & J. Polivy (Eds.),Advances in the study of communication and affect: Assessment and modification of emotional behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 139–163). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D., & Butler, L. (1980). Toward a conceptual model for the treatment of test anxiety: Implications for research and treatment. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.),Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 187–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, O., & Cameron, R. (1981). Issues in cognitive assessment: An overview. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.),Cognitive Assessment (pp. 3–15). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. G. (1973, April).The effects of prior computer exposure on man-machine computer anxiety. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association Convention, Montreal. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 089 763)

  • Raub, A. C. (1982). Correlates of computer anxiety in college students.Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4775A. (University Microfilms No. DA8208027)

  • Reece, M. J., & Gable, R. K. (1982). The development and validation of a measure of general attitudes toward computers.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42 913–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19 551–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., & Heinssen, R. K., Jr. (1984).Computer tasks for computer anxiety research [Computer program]. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohner, D. J., & Simonson, M. R. (1981, April).Development of an index of computer anxiety. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Philadelphia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 207 512)

  • Sampson, J. P., Jr. (1983). Computer-assisted testing and assessment: Current status and implications for the future.Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 15 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G. (1978). The test anxiety scale: Concept and research. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.),Stress and anxiety (Vol. 5, pp. 193–218). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., & Stoops, R. (1978). Test anxiety and the passage of time.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 102–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970).State-trait anxiety inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. B., & Fuerst, M. (1984).Computer phobia. Effingham, IL: Banbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention.Psychological Bulletin, 76 92–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wine, J. (1980). Cognitive-attentional theory of test anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.),Test anxiety: Theory, research, and application (pp. 349–385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glass, C.R., Knight, L.A. Cognitive factors in computer anxiety. Cogn Ther Res 12, 351–366 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173303

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173303

Key words

Navigation