Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 185–192 | Cite as

Association-dissociation patterns of United States Olympic Marathon Trial contestants

  • John M. SilvaIII
  • Mark I. Appelbaum


The association-dissociation cognitive patterns of United States Olympic Marathon Trial contestants were investigated on the basis of responses to the Running Styles Questionnaire. The night prior to the Olympic Trials, 32 subjects responded to 12 multiple-choice-type questions and 6 open-ended questions that probed the type of cognitions processed by the athletes at different stages of the race. Discriminant function analysis resulted in a significant multivariate solution (p <.01), with 5 of the 12 multiple-choice questions maximizing the separation of athletes into groups of top- and lower-place finishers. The composite of these 5 questions suggested that top finishers employed cognitive strategies that utilized both associative and dissociative techniques. Lower finishers demonstrated a composite that indicated the early adoption and maintenance of a dissociative strategy. On the basis of the multivariate solution, athletes were classified to appropriate group membership with 71.88% overall accuracy. The results tend to support the contention that cognitive strategies employed during marathon racing are related to the participant's performance level.

Key words

sport psychology cognitive styles association-dissociation patterns psychology of marathoners 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beers, T. M., & Karoly, P. (1979). Cognitive strategies, expectancy, and coping style in the control of pain.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47 179–180.Google Scholar
  2. Burfoot, A. (1980, August). Still the very best marathon in America.Runner's World, 41–47.Google Scholar
  3. Kroll, W., Clarkson, P., Melchionda, A., & Wilcox, A. (1981). Isometric knee extension and plantar flexion muscle fatigue and fiber type composition in female distance runners.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 52 200–207.Google Scholar
  4. Mahoney, M. J. (1979). Cognitive skills and athletic performance. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research and procedures. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  5. Mahoney, M. J., & Avener, M. (1977). Psychology of the elite athlete: An exploratory study.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1 135–141.Google Scholar
  6. Morgan, W. (1978, April). Mind of the marathoner.Psychology Today, 38–49.Google Scholar
  7. Morgan, W., & Costill, D. (1972). Psychological characteristics of the marathon runner.Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 12 42–46.Google Scholar
  8. Morgan, W. P., Horstman, D. H., Cymerman, A., & Stokes, J. (1983). Facilitation of physical performance by means of a cognitive strategy.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7 251–264.Google Scholar
  9. Morgan, W., & Pollock, M. (1977). Psychologic characterization of the elite distance runner.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 301 382–403.Google Scholar
  10. Okwumabua, T. M., Meyers, A. W., Schleser, R., & Cooke, C. J. (1983). Cognitive strategies and running performance: An exploratory study.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7 363–370.Google Scholar
  11. Pennebaker, J., & Lightner, J. (1980). Competition of internal and external information in an exercise setting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 165–174.Google Scholar
  12. Pollock, M., Jackson, A., & Pate, R. (1980). Discriminant analysis of physiological differences between good and elite distance runners.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 51 521–532.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. SilvaIII
    • 1
  • Mark I. Appelbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical EducationUNCChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations