Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 471–477 | Cite as

Are inappropriate or dysfunctional feelings in rational-emotive therapy qualitative or quantitative?

  • Albert Ellis
  • Raymond DiGiuseppe
Article

Abstract

A reply is made to Cramer and Fong's (1991) findings that inappropriate or dysfunctional feelings, as hypothesized in rational—emotive theory, are quantitatively rather than qualitatively different from appropriate or functional feelings.

Keywords

Cognitive Psychology Emotive Theory Dysfunctional Feeling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cramer (1985). Irrational beliefs and strength versus inappropriateness of feelings.British Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 3 81–92.Google Scholar
  2. Cramer, D., & Fong, J. (1991). Effect of rational and irrational beliefs on intensity and “inappropriateness” of feelings: A test of rational-emotive theory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15 319–329.Google Scholar
  3. Ellis, A. (1977). The basic clinical theory of rational-emotive therapy. In A. Ellis & R. Grieger (Eds.),Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (pp. 3–34). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, A. (1985a). Differentiating inappropriate from appropriate feelings in RET.British Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 3 90–92.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, A. (1985b).Overcoming resistance. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Ellis, A. (1986). An emotional control card for inappropriate and appropriate emotions in using rational-emotive imagery.Journal of Counseling and Development, 65 205–206.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, A., & Harper, R. A. (1975).A new guide to rational living North Hollywood, CA: Wilshire Books.Google Scholar
  8. Izard, C. (1989). The structure and functions of emotions: Implications for cognition, motivation, and personality. In I. Cohen (Ed.),The G. Stanley Hall lecture series (Vol. 9, pp. 35–74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  9. Smith, W. (1989). Assessment in rational-emotive therapy: Empirical access to the ABCD model. In M. E. Bernard & R. DiGiuseppe (Eds.),Inside rational-emotive therapy: A critical appraisal of the theory and therapy of Albert Ellis (pp. 135–153). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Towards a consensual structure of mood.Psychological Bulletin, 98 219–235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Ellis
    • 1
  • Raymond DiGiuseppe
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Rational-Emotive TherapyNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.St. John's UniversityBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations