Abstract
Perceived self-efficacy was introduced by Bandura (1977) as “an integrative theoretical framework to explain and predict psychological changes achieved by different modes of treatment” (p. 191). Subsequent empirical studies appear to support the contention that self-efficacy ratings on specific behavioral tasks are accurate predictors of subsequent behavioral performance on those tasks. In this paper we examine the conceptual basis of self-efficacy theory. In particular, the distinction between outcome and efficacy expectations is analyzed in relation to fear and avoidant behavior. We conclude that self-efficacy theory is conceptually problematic and, in particular, that the central concept of efficacy expectations is not unambiguously differentiated from outcome expectations, despite Bandura's (1978) claim to the contrary. Similarly, we suggest that what is actually being assessed in the empirical studies is unclear. We conclude that the empirical findings are less impressive when the circumscribed nature of the behavioral tasks is recognized. Finally, we suggest that resolutions of both the conceptual and methodological difficulties are necessary before Bandura's (1978) claim, that self-efficacy is a unifying construct, can be properly evaluated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulate.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87 49–74.
Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. (1978). Special issue on perceived self-efficacy,1, 137–269.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 84 191–215.
Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy.Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1 237–269.
Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1 287–310.
Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 125–139.
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., Hardy, A. B., & Howells, G. N. (1980). Tests of the generality of self-efficacy theory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4 39–66.
Borkovec, T. D. (1978). Self-efficacy: Cause or reflection of behavioral change?Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1 163–170.
Kazdin, A. E. (1978). Conceptual and assessment issues raised by self-efficacy theory.Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1 177–185.
Kirsch, I. (1980). “Microanalytic” analysis of efficacy expectations as predictors of performance.Cognitive Therapy and Research 4 259–262.
Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change?Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1 211–215.
Wolpe, J. (1978). Self-efficacy theory and psychotherapeutic change: A square peg for a round hole.Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1 231–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eastman, C., Marzillier, J.S. Theoretical and methodological difficulties in Bandura's self-efficacy theory. Cogn Ther Res 8, 213–229 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172994
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172994