Skip to main content
Log in

Interpreting magic-number and evaporation effects in cluster size distributions

  • Published:
Journal of Cluster Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Smoluchowski equations describe the coalescence of clusters to form larger clusters. If the kernels or rate constants in these equations are homogeneous, meaning thatK λj, λk =λ K jk (wherej andk are cluster sizes), it can be shown that the populationsn k approachAk a e -bk for largek and large time, where the constantsa andb depend on the homogeneity parameterω. Deviations of observed populations from this formula may be ascribed to magic-number and/or evaporation effects on the kernels. By integrating the Smoluchowski equations numerically for various choices of the kernels, we derive population distributions and show the effects of magic-number clusters and evaporation on the population distribution. Various methods are used to extract the value ofω, in order to determine the best way to extract the underlying value ofω from experimental data. Experimental populations for sodium metal clusters are then analyzed according to the same procedure, to extract the homogeneity parameter and explain the patterns in the population distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Kappes and S. Leutwyler (1988). In G. Scoles (ed.),Atomic and Molecular Beam Methods, Vol. 1, Chap. 15 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Rooney, T. Byassee, D. Macero, B. Vastag, and J. Chaiken (1990).J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 1162–1166; J. U. S. Chaiken (1990). Patent 4.971,853.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Chaiken, M. J. Casey, and M. Villarica (1992)J. Phys. Chem. 96, 3183.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. J. Casey, J. M. Osman, and J. Chaiken (1992).Proc. SPIE 1626, 317.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Villarica, M. J. Casey, J. Goodisman, and J. Chaiken (1993).J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Jullien (1990).New Journal Chem. 14, 239.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Botet and R. Jullien (1984).J. Phys. A 17, 2517.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. V. Smoluchowski (1917).Phys. Zeits. 17, 557.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Goodisman and J. Chaiken (1994).J. Photosci. Photobiol. A: Chem. 80, 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Siano (1972).J. Chem. Ed. 49, 755: G. Herdan and M. L. Smith. Small Particle Statistics (Elsevier, New York, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. D. Knight, K. Clemenger, W. A. de Heer, W. Saunders, M. Y. Chou, and M. L. Cohen (1984).Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2141.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. D. Klots, B. J. Winter, E. Parts, and S. J. Riley (1990).J. Chem. Phys. 92, 2110.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. W. Kroto, J. R. Heath, S. C. O'Brien, R. F. Curl, and S. E. Smalley (1985).Nature (London) 318. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Suslick (1991).Nature (London) 353, 414.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. J. Auerbach, in G. Scoles (ed.).Atomic and Molecular Beam Methods, Vol. 1, Chap. I (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Zumofen, A. Blumen, and J. Klafter (1990).New J. Chem. 14, 189–196, and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Tence, J. P. Chevaier, and R. Jullien (1986).J. Physique 47. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Pool (1990).Science 248, 186–1188, and references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. P. Martin, T. Bergmann, H. Gohlich, and T. Lange (1991).J. Phys. Chem.95. 5421.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. H. Stockmayer (1943).J. Chem. Pins. 11, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. W. Brady. J. Doll, and D. L. Thompson (1979).J. Chem. Phys. 71, 2467.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Brchignac, P. Cahuzac, and J. Leygnier (1989).J. Crem. Phys. 90, 1493.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. J. Laidler.Chemical Kinetics (Harpher and Row. New York, 1987), p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. V. Dem'yanenko and A. A. Puretzky (1990).Spectrochimica Acta A 46, 509.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. A. Puretzky, in J. Chaiken (ed.).Laser Chemistry of Organometallics, ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 503 (American Chemical Society. Washington, D.C. 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. H. Bauer (1977).J. Phys. Chem. 81, 1479.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaiken, J., Goodisman, J. Interpreting magic-number and evaporation effects in cluster size distributions. J Clust Sci 6, 319–342 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01169699

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01169699

Key words

Navigation