Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical algebra. I: Fuzzy subgroups

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the notion of fuzzy subset, the algebraic formulation of the constant of stereogenic pairing equilibria between skeletal analogs (previously disclosed) is connected to symmetry group theory. A distinction is introduced between geometrical (skeletal) symmetry and topographical (numerical parameters) symmetry. In order to describe “topographical symmetry”, a formal extended definition of a subgroup is proposed. Fuzzy subsets of the skeletal groupG are endowded with a structure which can be defined without referring to the geometrical representation of the abstract group isomorphic toG. The relevance of these propositions is evidenced by their “integer interpretation” meeting basic definitions of group theory, as well as by their role in expressing chemical pairing constants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. R. Chauvin, J. Phys. Chem 96(1992)4701.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Chauvin, J. Phys. Chem. 96(1992)4706.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.A. Johnson and G.M. Maggiora (s.),Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity (Wiley, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.L. Flurry,Symmetry Groups, (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Mislow and J. Siegel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106(1984)3319; S. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112(1990)3390; S. Fujita, Tetrahedron 47(1991)31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L.A. Zadeh, Inf. Control 8(1965)338; A. Kaufmann,Introduction à la Théorie des Sous-ensembles Flous (Masson & Cie, Paris, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Maruani and P. Mezey, P.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 305(II)(1987)1051;306(II)(1988)1141.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Otto, T. George, C. Schierle and W. Wegscheider, Pure & Appl. Chem. 64(1992)497.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Mislow and P. Bickart, Isr. J. Chem. 15(1977)1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Chauvin, Paper II of this series, J. Math. Chem. 16(1994)257.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Chauvin, Entropy in dissimilarity and chirality measure, submitted for publication (1994).

  12. The Hausdorff distance has been used for measuring geometrical chirality: A. Rassat, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris (II) 299(1984)53; A.B. Buda, T. Auf der Heyde and K. Mislow, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 31(1992)989; A.B. Buda and K. Mislow, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 6006. An alternative approach based on the maximal overlap method has been proposed: G. Gilat, Chem. Phys. Lett. 121 (1985) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Zabrodsky, S. Peleg and D. Avnir, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114(1992)7843.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chauvin, R. Chemical algebra. I: Fuzzy subgroups. J Math Chem 16, 245–256 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01169211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01169211

Keywords

Navigation