Skip to main content
Log in

Auditory stimulus duration effects on discrimination and brain activity

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    Electrical activity of the brain and conditioned-reflex behavior of cats were investigated during gradual shortening of the duration of stimuli from 3 to 0.015 sec. The progressively increasing difficulty and stress in stimulus analysis developing under these circumstances are revealed initially by changes in the EEG, and only later by disturbances in the animal's behavioral responses.

  2. 2.

    Three critical periods can be distinguished as the duration of the stimuli is reduced:

  1. a)

    shortening of the stimuli to 1 sec increases the degree of tonic activation of the background EEG and the electrical responses of the brain to positive and fine differential stimuli are prolonged; behavioral responses of most animals remain as before;

  2. b)

    with the change to a duration of 0.2–0.1 see, besides a further increase in the degree of EEG activation, marked disturbances of conditioned reflex activity arise; failure of fine differentiation and the appearance of after-inhibition;

  3. c)

    stimulus duration of 0.03–0.015 sec was critical: the highest level of tonic background EEG activation is achieved, the EEG desynchronization response becomes prolonged to all stimuli, including gross differential stimuli (1000 Hz). Individual animals can continue to differentiate the 1800 Hz tone at that duration, but only at the beginning of the experiment. Most cats remain capable only of 1000 Hz differentiation. In every case deep after-inhibition is regularly exhibited, and incorrect responses appeared with negative stimuli. As the experiments with the critical duration of acoustic stimulation continue, conditioned-reflex activity became disturbed and disorganized, and the animal developed neurotic behavior and trophic disturbances (loss of hair, eczema).

  1. 3.

    It is postulated that the decrease in stimulus duration is equivalent to some extent, to an increase in the fineness of differentiation. For stimuli of minimal duration (0.015 msec), the number of impulses reaching the brain is inadequate for the perfect fine analysis of the stimuli to determine their biological significance. This dependence of tonic and phasic EEG activation on the complexity of stimulus analysis indicates that, under the particular conditions used, the analyzer system of the brain modulates its activating mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ANDREEVA, V.N., A. BALTAEV and YU.G. KRATIN. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyatel. im I. P. Pavlova. 18:386, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ANDREEVA, V.N. and SH. KURBANOV. Abstracts of Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Higher Nervous Activity, to Commemorate the 120th Anniversary of I.P. Pavlov's Birth. Ryazan', 1969, p. 12.

  3. ASRATYAN, E.A. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. 4:475, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BARU, A.V. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyatel. im I.P. Pavlova. 17:107, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BARU, A.V. In: Mechanisms of Hearing. Nauka, Leningrad, 1967, p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  6. BARU, A.V., G.V. GERSHUNI and I.M. TONKONOGII. Zh. Nevropatol. Psikhiat. im S.S. Karsakova. 64:481, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  7. VARDAPETYAN, G.A. Electrical Activity of the Auditory Cortex. Dissertation, Leningrad, 1969.

  8. GERSHUNI, G.V. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyatel. im I.P. Pavlova. 15:260, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  9. GERSHUNI, G.V., U.G. GASANOV, N.V. ZABOEVA and M.M. LEBEDINSKII. Biofizika. 9:597, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DOBROVOL'SKII. Food Trace Reflexes. Dissertation, St. Petersburg, 1911.

  11. KRATIN, YU.G. Electrical Responses of the Brain to Inhibitory Stimuli. Nauka, Leningrad, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  12. KRATIN, YU.G. and V.N. ANDREEVA. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyatel. im I.P. Pavlova. 16: 3, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  13. KRATIN, YU.G., V.N. ANDREEVA and SH. KURBANOV. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyatel. im I.P. Pavlova. 20:537, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. KRATIN, YU.G., N.P. BEKHTEREVA, V.I GUSEL'NIKOV, V.A. KOZHEVNIKOV, B.T. SENICHENKOV and V.V. USOV. Techniques and Methods in Electroencephalography. Moscow-Leningrad, 1963.

  15. KRATIN, YU.G., A.I. ZAVOROTNYI, YU.N. PETROV and A.N. SOLOV'EV. Fiziol. Zh. SSSR im I.M. Sechenova. 55:1163, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  16. KUPALOV, P.S. In: Electroencephalographic Investigation of Higher Nervous Activity. Moscow, 1962, p. 9.

  17. KUPALOV, P.S. and B.N. LUKOV. Arkh. Biol. Nauk. 33:665, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  18. KURBANOV, SH. Electroencephalographic Investigation of Analysis of Stimuli by the Brain during Shortening of their Action Time. Dissertation, Leningrad, 1970.

  19. LIANG SHIH-AN and L. A. SHISTOVICH. Akust. Zh. 6:80, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  20. MKRTYCHEVA, L.I. Tr. Inst. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyatel. 1:207, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  21. NEUMYVAKA, D.P. Mechanisms of the Conditioning Function of the Cortex to Stimuli of Different Durations. Dissertation, Leningrad, 1954.

  22. ORBELI, L.A. Conditioned Reflexes from the Eye in Dogs. Dissertation, St. Petersburg, 1908.

  23. PYSHINA, S.P. Byull. Eksp. Biol. Med. 36(1):1953.

  24. KHANANASHVILI, M.M. Abstracts of Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the All-Union Physiological Society, vol. 2, 1964, p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  25. KHANANASHVILI, M.M. Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyatel. im I.P. Pavlova. 18:755, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  26. BEKESY, G. Sensory Inhibition. Princeton Univ. Press, 1967.

  27. KÖNIG, E. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 29:606, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  28. MAGOUN, H.W. The Waking Brain. Springfield, Thomas, 1958.

  29. MILLER, G. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 20:160, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MORUZZI, G. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16(2):1964.

  31. NEFF, W.D. In: Sensory Communication. MIT Press and Wiley, New York, 1961, p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  32. OETINGER, R. Acoustika. 9:430, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  33. PORT, E. Acoustika. 13:212, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  34. SEKEY, A. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 35:682, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andreeva, V.N., Kratin, Y.G. & Kurbanov, S. Auditory stimulus duration effects on discrimination and brain activity. Neurosci Behav Physiol 5, 10–23 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01163374

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01163374

Keywords

Navigation