Skip to main content
Log in

The role of reduction mammaplasty in oncology

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: A procedure to achieve symmetry is required in almost 50% of the cases of breast reconstruction and provides an opportunity to explore the second breast and eventually to remove any area which is suspect. The various techniques available for the symmetry procedure should be discussed according to the breast exploration required. This study analyzes the different types of reduction mammaplasty (RM) techniques, the histology and localization of contralateral tumors which allow the plastic surgeon to diagnose occult breast cancer more accurately.Method: From 1978 to 1993, 1814 patients with breast cancer underwent a mastectomy with breast reconstruction at the Gustave-Roussy Institute. A contralateral RM to achieve symmetry was performed in 440 patients.Results: Twenty (4.5%) clinically and radiologically occult breast cancers were found among the contralateral RM specimens. The relationship between the type of RM technique and incidence of occult breast cancer was not significant: 16 cases of occult breast carcinomas in 305 RM with supra-areolar pedicle and four cases from 135 RM with infra-areolar pedicle (Fisher exactp=0.21).Conclusion: Close collaboration between plastic surgeon and oncologist is required while performing a breast reconstruction in order to take advantage of the surgery of the second breast to explore the gland and to remove occult carcinomas in approximately 5% of cases. The choice of RM procedure depends usually on the shape of the breast and often the personal preference of the surgeon but this should also be planned according to the glandular area to be explored. There results underline the absolute necessity of histological examination of all the specimens removed in all kinds of breast reduction also when it is performed for purely aesthetic reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pack G (1951) Argument for bilateral mastectomy. Surgery 29:929

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fontaine F, Contesso G, Mouriesse H, Travagli JP, Sarrazin D (1985) Bilateralisation des cancers du sein. Bull Cancer (Paris) 72:127

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bloodgood JC (1921) The remaining breast after radical removal of the opposite side for cancer. J South Surg Assoc 34:223

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hubbard TBJ (1953) Nonsimultaneous bilateral carcinoma of the breast. Surgery 34:2460

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farrow JH (1956) Bilateral mammary cancer. Cancer 9:1182

    Google Scholar 

  6. Urban JA, Marjani MA (1871) Significance of internal mammary lymph node metastase in breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 3:130

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Mascarel I, Trojani M, Coindre JM, Faucher A (1986) The incidence of cancer in contralateral reduction mammaplasty after mastectomy and reconstruction of the removed breast. Tumori 72:183

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pitanguy I (1981) Reduction mammaplasty. In: Aesthetic plastic surgery of head and body. Springer, Berlin, vol 1, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  9. McKissock PK (1976) Reduction mammaplasty by the vertical bipedicle flap technique. Clin Plast Surg 3:309

    Google Scholar 

  10. Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1980) Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique: an alternative to free nipple and areolar grafting for severe macromastia or extreme ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:646

    Google Scholar 

  11. Georgide NG, Serafin D, Morris R, Georgide GS (1979) Reduction mammaplasty utilizing an inferior pedicle nipple-areolar flap. Ann Plast Surg 3:211

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bondeson L, Linell F, Ringberg A (1985) Breast reductions: what to do with all the tissue specimens? Histopathology 9:281

    Google Scholar 

  13. Urban JA, Papachristou D, Taylor J (1977) Bilateral breast cancer. Cancer 40:1968

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wanebo H, Senofsky G, Fechner R (1985) Bilateral breast cancer. Risk reduction by contralateral biopsy. Ann Surg 201:667

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith BL, Bertagnolli M, Klein BB (1992) Evaluation of the contralateral breast. The role of biopsy at the time of treatment of primary breast cancer. Ann Surg 216:17

    Google Scholar 

  16. Spratt JS, Donegan WL (1971) Cancer of the breast. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 133

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dinner MI, Artz JS (1989) Carcinoma of the breast occurring in routine reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 83:1042

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rietjens, M., Petit, J.Y., Contesso, G. et al. The role of reduction mammaplasty in oncology. Eur J Plast Surg 20, 246–249 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01159483

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01159483

Key words

Navigation