Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational status, earnings, and fertility expectations: Development and estimation of a causal model

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper tests, within the framework of LISREL, the causal structures of occupational status, earnings, and fertility expectations using data from the 1984 Canadian Fertility Survey of currently married and common-law women aged 18–44. Differential occupational status, earnings, and fertility among three groups of wives classified by generation of Canadian residence are also examined. The models incorporate age, education, work experience, and ethnic/English language ability as exogenous determinants of occupational status, earnings, and fertility.

The major findings are: (1) lower earnings of third generation wives are strongly related to lower levels of education, work experience, and job status; (2) wives who speak an ethnic language are likely to have lower fertility than comparable wives who do not speak an ethnic language; and (3) generational effects on earnings and fertility are limited to differences in education, work experience, and occupational status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balakrishnan, T.R., Karol J. Krotki, and Evelyne Lapierre-Adamcyk (1985), ‘Contraceptive Use in Canada, 1984,’Family Planning Perspectives, 17, pp. 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, Frank D. and John P. Marcum (1978), ‘Differential Fertility and the Minority Group Status Hypothesis: An Assessment and Review,’ in: Frank D. Bean and W. Parker Frisbie (eds.),The Demography of Racial and Ethnic Groups, New York, pp. 189–211.

  • Bean, Frank D. and C. Gray Swicegood (1982), ‘Generation, Female Education, and Mexican American Fertility,’Social Science Quarterly, 63, pp. 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, Frank D., Ruth M. Cullen, Elizabeth H. Stephen, and C. Gray Swicegood (1984), ‘Generational Differences in Fertility among Mexican Americans: Implications for Assessing the Effects of Immigration,’Social Science Quarterly, 65(2), pp. 572–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaujot, Roderic P., Karol J. Krotki, and P. Krishnan (1977), ‘Analysis of Ethnic Fertility Differentials through the Consideration of Assimilation,’ Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, St. Louis.

  • Blake, Judith (1968), ‘Are Babies Consumer Durables?,’Population Studies, 22, pp. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blishen, Bernard R. and Hugh A. McRoberts (1976), ‘A Revised Socioeconomic Index for Occupations in Canada,’Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 13(February), pp. 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Monica (1979), ‘Immigrants, Income Attainments, and Labour Markets in Canada,’ Paper Presented at the 1979 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

  • Cain, Glen G. (1966),Married Women in the Labour Force: An Economic Analysis, Chicago.

  • Cain, Glen G. and Adriana Weininger (1973), ‘Economic Determinants of Fertility: Results from Cross-Sectional Aggregate Data,’Demography 10, pp. 205–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, Richard A. (1969), ‘Toward a Socio-economic Theory of Fertility,’ in: S.J. Behrmanet al. (eds.),Fertility and Family Planning. A World View, Ann Arbor, pp. 127–156.

  • Featherman, David L. and Robert M. Hauser (1978),Opportunity and Change, New York.

  • Fischer, Nancy A. and John P. Marcum (1984), ‘Ethnic Integration, Socio-economic Status, and Fertility among Mexican Americans,’Social Science Quarterly, 65, pp. 583–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, W., W. McManus and F. Welch (1982), ‘Hispanic Earnings Differentials: The Role of English Proficiency,’ Report Sponsored by the National Commission for Employment Policy.

  • Johnson, Nan E. (1979), ‘Minority Group Status and the Fertility of Black Americans 1970: A New Look,’American Journal of Sociology, 84, pp. 1386–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K.G. (1973), ‘A General Method of Estimating a Linear Equation System,’ in: A.S. Goldberger and O.D. Duncan (eds.),Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, New York, pp. 85–112.

  • Joreskog, K.G. (1977), ‘Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences: Specification, Estimation, and Testing,’ in: P.R. Krishnaiah (ed.),Applications of Statistics, Amsterdam, pp. 265–287.

  • Joreskog, K.G: and D. Sorbom (1978),LISREL IV: Analysis of Linear Structural Relations by the Method of Maximum Likelihood, Chicago.

  • Joreskog, K.G. and D. Sorbom (1982), ‘Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modelling,’Journal of Marketing Research, 19, pp. 404–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K.G. and D. Sorbom (1986),LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Square Methods, Mooresville, Indiana.

  • Ladewig, Becky H. and Gail W. McGee (1986), ‘Occupational Commitment, a Supportive Family Environment, and Marital Adjustment: Development and Estimation of a Model,’Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, pp. 821–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Steven D. (1983), ‘English Language Proficiency and the Earnings of MexicanAmerican Men,’ Paper Presented at the 1983 Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania.

  • Mincer, Jacob (1962), ‘Labor Force Participation of Married Women,’ in: H.G. Lewis (ed.),Aspects of Labor Economics, Princeton, N.J., pp. 63-97.

  • Mincer, Jacob (1974),Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, New York.

  • Oppenheimer, Valerie K. (1972), ‘Rising Educational Attainment, Declining Fertility, and the Inadeqanceies of the Female Labor Market,’ in: Charles F. Westoff and R. Parke, Jr. (eds.),Demographic and Social Aspects of Population Growth, The Commission of Population Growth and the American Future, Research Reports, Vol. 1. Washington, D.C., pp. 305–328.

  • Roberts, Robert E. and Eun Sul Lee (1974), ‘Minority Group Status and Fertility Revisited,’American Journal of Sociology, 80, pp. 503–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwaike, Ira (1973), ‘Two Generations of Italians in America: Their Fertility Experience,’International Migration Review, 7, pp. 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Stanley K. (1981), ‘Determinants of Female Labour Force Participation and Family Size in Mexico City,’Economic Development and Cultural Change, 30, pp. 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, Craig and Harold Grasmick (1983), ‘Racial Differences in the Fertility Process: An Elaboration of the Minority-Group Status Hypothesis,’ Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania.

  • Tremblay, V. and G. Trudel (1984),Canadian Fertility Survey: Methodological Report, Montreal, PQ., Centre de Sondage, Université de Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenberg, Peter R. (1973), ‘Fertility Patterns with the Mexican American Population,’Social Biology, 20, pp. 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdugo, Naomi T. and Richard R. Verdugo (1984), ‘Earnings Differentials Among Mexican American, Black, and White Male Workers,’Social Science Quarterly, 65, pp. 416–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, Linda J. (1980), ‘Working Wives and the Family Life Cycle,’American Journal of Sociology, 86, pp. 272–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C.F., R.G. Potter, P.C. Sagi, and E.G. Mishler (1961),Family Growth in Metropolitan America, Princeton.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is grateful to Dr. Karol J. Krotki, co-director of the Canadian Fertility Study, for permission to analyze the Canadian Fertility Survey data. Special thanks are also due to Ms. Margaret King for her comments on an earlier draft of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krishnan, V. Occupational status, earnings, and fertility expectations: Development and estimation of a causal model. De Economist 136, 358–382 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01151809

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01151809

Keywords

Navigation