Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in left ventricular filling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis

  • Articles
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of aortic valve replacement on the pattern of left ventricular inflow velocity, pulsed wave Doppler analysis was performed in 20 patients with isolated aortic stenosis. Complementary, left ventricular wall thickness was measured, using M-mode echocardiography. One week after operation, left ventricular wall thickness is not changed significantly. The Doppler findings suggest some improvement of left ventricular filling. Six months and 1 year postoperatively, there is a significant, but incomplete regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Left ventricular filling improved only partially, compared to preoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith N, Mc Anulty JH, Rahimtoola SH. Severe aortic valve stenosis with impaired left ventricular function and clinical heart failure: results of valve replacement. Circulation 1978; 58(2): 255–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krayenbuehl HP, Turina M, Hess OM, Rothlin M, Senning A. Pre- and postoperative left ventricular contractile function in patients with aortic valve disease. Br Heart J 1979; 41: 204–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pantely G, Morton M, Rahimtoola SH. Effect of successful, uncomplicated valve replacement on ventricular hypertrophy, volume and performance in aortic stenosis and in aortic incompetence. J Thorac Cardiovas Surg 1978; 75(3): 383–91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 526–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spirito P, Maron BJ, Bonow RO. Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function: comparative analysis of Doppler echocardiographic and radionuclide angiographic techniques. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 518–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Romhilt DH, Estes EH. A point-score system for ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1968; 75: 752–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McFarland TM, Alain M, Goldstein S, Pukard SD, Stein PD. Echocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1978; 57: 1140–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reichek H, Devereux RB. Left ventricular hypertrophy: relationship of anatomic, echocardiographic and eleclro-cardiographic findings. Circulation 1981; 63: 1391–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fouad FM, Slominski JM, Tarazi RC. Left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension: relation to left ventricular mass and systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3(6): 1500–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatle L, Angelsen B. Pulsed and continuous wave Doppler in diagnosis and assessment of various heart lesions. In: Hatle L, Angelsen B, (eds). Doppler ultrasound in cardiology. Physical principles and clinical applications. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1985: 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hakki AH, Iskandrian AS, Bemis CE et al. A simplified valve formula for the calculation of stenotic cardiac valve areas. Circulation 1981; 63 II suppl: 1050–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy JW, Trenholme SE, Kasser IS. Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiocardiogram. A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods. Am Heart J 1970; 80(3): 343–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt D, Baxley WA, Kennedy JW, Judge TP, Williams JE, Dodge HT. Quantitative evaluation of cineaortography in the assessment of aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 1973; 31; 696–700.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurst JW. Coronary arteriography and left ventriculography. In: Hurst JW, Logue BR, (eds). The heart. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986: 1791–1805.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Devereux RB, Reicheck N. Left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Rev Rep 1980; 1: 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grossman W. Cardiac hypertrophy: useful adaptation or pathologic process? Am J Med 1980; 69: 576–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Murakami T, Hess OM, Gage JE, Grimm J, Krayenbuehl HP. Diastolic filling dynamics in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 1986; 73(6): 1162–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fouad FM, Slominski JM, Tarazi RC. Left ventricular diastolic function in hypertension: relation to left ventricular mass and systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 1500–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibson DG, Traill TA, Hall RJC, Brown DJ. Echocardiographic features of secondary left ventricular hypertrophy. Br Heart J 1979; 41: 54–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanrath P, Mathey DG, Siegarl R, Bleifeld W. Left venlricular relaxation and filling pattern in differenl forms of left ventricular hypertrophy: an echocardiographic study. Am J Cardiol 1980; 45: 15–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Amsler LC. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular diastolic filling in isolated valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 313–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Denef BR, Aubert AE, De Geest H. The spectrum of left ventricular filling in severe aortic stenosis. Int J Card Imaging 1991; 7: 101–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Labovitz AJ, Pearson AC. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: clinical relevance and recent Doppler echocardiographic insights. Am J Cardiol 1987; 114: 836–51.

    Google Scholar 

  24. St John Sutton M, Plappert T, Spiegel A et al. Early postoperative changes in left ventricular chamber size, architecture and function in aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation and their relation to intraoperative changes in afterload: a prospective two-dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation 1987; 76(1): 77–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Monrad ES, Hess OM, Murakami T, Nonogi H, Corin WJ, Krayenbuehl HP. Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1988; 77(6): 1345–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carabello BA. Prognosis of aortic valve disease. Current Opinion Cardiology 1989; 4: 223–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sen S, Bumpus FM. Collagen synthesis in development and reversal of cardiac hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Cardiol 1979; 44: 954–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oldershaw PJ, Brooksby IAB, Davies MJ, Coltart J, Jenkins BS, Webb-Peploe MM. Correlations of fibrosis in endomyocardial biopsies from patients with aortic valve disease. Br Heart J 1980; 44: 609–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weber KT, Janicki JS, Prik R et al. Collagen in the hypertrophied, pressure-overloaded myocardium. Circulation 1987; 75(suppl I): 40–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herregods, M.C., Denef, B., Aubert, A. et al. Changes in left ventricular filling after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiac Imag 9, 149–155 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01145316

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01145316

Key words

Navigation