Abstract
Current methods of public sector collective bargaining are modeled after private sector bilateral negotiations. Often they do not adequately reflect the pluralistic nature of the many publics affected by the results of such negotiations. In this study the authors examine the present methods of collective bargaining particularly as they relate to the public sector. The argument is made that in the public sector, particularly where public education is concerned, bilateral negotiations are not adequate nor desirable. They violate our democratic, pluralistic traditions. The legal and political issues involved in public bargaining are examined, as are current and suggested third party roles in the process. Four multilateral models for pluralist bargaining are then developed and discussed. The article concludes with a call for formalized public participation in public education collective bargaining.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banfield, E.Political Influence: A New Theory of Urban Politics. New York: Free Press, 1961.
Bent, A. E., and Reeves, T. J.Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector: Labor-Management Relations and Public Policy. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings, 1978.
Brookshire, M. L., and Rogers, M. D.Collective Bargaining in Public Employment: The TVA “Model”. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1977.
Collective Bargaining and Teacher Strikes. Columbia, Md.: The National Committee for Citizens in Education, 1979.
The Community at the Bargaining Table. Boston: Institute for Responsive Education, 1975.
Dahl, R. A.Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.
Englert, R. Politics and collective bargaining in public education: the case of Philadelphia, 1978.Cross Reference, 1979,2 (3).
Fisher, R., and Ury, W.Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. New York: Penguin, 1983.
Hirschmann, A. E.Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970.
Hunter, F.Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1953.
Lefkowitz, J. Unionism in the human services industries.Albany Law Review 1972,36 505–562.
Lewin, D., Collective bargaining and the right to strike. In S. L. Chickering (Ed.),Public Employee Unions. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1977.
Lynd, R., and Lynd, H.Middletown. New York: Macmillan, 1929. Idem.Middletown in Transition. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1937.
McLennan, K., and Moskow, M. H. Multilateral bargaining in the public sector. In J. J. Loewenberg and M. H. Moskow,Collective Bargaining in Government: Reading and Cases. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
Mitchell, D. E., Kerchner, C. T., Erck, W., and Pryor, G. The impact of collective bargaining on school management and policy.American Journal of Education 1981,89 147–188.
Philadelphia Inquirer, July 7, 1974, p. 5.
Pierce, N. R., and Sullam, B. Government workers, officials go to the public over collective bargaining.National Journal, January 8, 1977, pp. 69–75.
Schick, R. P., and Couturier, J. M.The Public Interest in Government Labor Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1977.
School District of Philadelphia. Agreement between the board of education and the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, Local 3, 1977.
Tiebout, C. C. A pure theory of public expenditures.Journal of Political Economy 1956,LXIV 416–424.
Wellington, H. K., and Winter, R. K., Jr. The limits of collective bargaining in public employment. In A. L. Chickering (Ed.),Public Employee Unions. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Featherman, S., Roberts, L. Pluralist models of public sector collective bargaining: Proposals for public education. Urban Rev 16, 219–233 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142980
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142980