Abstract
As a new approach to educational accountability, minimum competency testing (MCT) has created considerable controversy. While its supporters believe that the new policy will be of particular value to students from minority and low-income backgrounds, critics are concerned about the possible adverse consequences for these groups. A review of research evidence and results of statewide MCT programs indicate that there is a substantial discrepancy between the initial test performances of black students and their white classmates and that, in some cases, post-test remediation seems relatively ineffective for blacks. Moreover, blacks may be receiving a disproportionate share of all diploma sanctions imposed on repeated MCT failers. It is proposed that some problems currently associated with competency testing can be avoided by emphasizing the remedial rather than the punitive function of these programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blau, T. Minimum competency testing: psychological implications for students. In R. Jaeger and C. Tittle (Eds.),Minimum Competency Achievement Testing. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1980.
California State Department of Education.Statewide Summary of Student Performance on School District Proficiency Assessments, Sacramento, 1981.
Coleman, J. Methods and results in the IEA studies of effects of school on learning.Review of Educational Research 1975,45 335–386.
Coleman, J. et al.Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966.
Debra P. v. Turlington. 474 F. Supp 244 (M. D. FLA, 1979); 644 F. 2d 397 (5th Cir., 1981).
Eckland, B. Sociodemographic implications of minimum competency testing. In R. Jaeger and C. Tittle (Eds.),Minimum Competency Achievement Testing. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1980.
Flygare, T. Graduation competency testing fails in Georgia.Phi Delta Kappan 1981,63 134–135.
Gilman, B. The logic of minimum competency testing.NASSP Bulletin 1978,62 56–63.
Glass, G. Minimum competence and incompetence in Florida.Phi Delta Kappan 1978,59 602–605.
Glass, G. Looking at minimal competency testing: educator vs. senator.Education and Urban Society 1979,12 47–55.
Gorth, W., and Perkins, M.A Study of Minimum Competency Programs: Final Summary and Analysis Report. Amherst, Mass.: National Evaluation Systems, 1979.
Haney, W., and Madaus, G. Making sense of the competency testing movement.Harvard Educational Review 1978,48 462–484.
Hart, G. The California Pupil Proficiency Law as viewed by its author.Phi Delta Kappan 1978,59 592–595.
Jencks, C. et al.Who Gets Ahead?: The Determinants of Economic Success in America. New York: Basic Books, 1979.
Madaus, G. NIE clarification hearing: the negative team's case.Phi Delta Kappan 1981,63 92–94.
Madaus, G., and Airasian, P. Issues in evaluating outcomes in competency based graduation programs.Journal of Research and Development in Education 1977,10 77–91.
Maryland State Department of Education. State Superintendent's memo to local superintendents of schools. Baltimore, 4/12/81.
National Education Association v. South Carolina. 434 U. S. 1026 (1978).
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.Report of Student Performance: Class of 1980 and Class of 1981. Raleigh, 1981 (a).
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. Assistant Superintendent's memorandum: Competency Testing Update—Legal. Raleigh, 2/6/81 (b).
Popham, W. J. The case for minimum competency testing.Phi Delta Kappan 1981,63 89–91.
Pullin, D. Minimum competency testing and the demand for accountability.Phi Delta Kappan 1981,63 20–22.
Richman, C. Competency test failure and its consequences. Unpublished manuscript, Wake Forest University, 1981.
Serow, R., and Davies, J. Resources and outcomes of minimum competency testing as measures of equality of educational opportunity. Unpublished manuscript, North Carolina State University, 1981.
Serow, R., Davies, J., and Parramore, B. Performance gains in a competency test program.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. In press.
Spady, W., and Mitchell, D. Competency based education: organizational issues and implications.Educational Researcher 1977,6 9–15.
Teslowski, D. The functional literacy test: Florida's approach to competency testing.Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning 1980,56 67–94.
Virginia Department of Education.Report of Virginia Graduation Competency Test Results. Richmond, March 1981.
Washington v. Davis. 426 U. S 229 (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serow, R.C. Effects of minimum competency testing for minority students: A review of expectations and outcomes. Urban Rev 16, 67–75 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142699
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142699