Skip to main content
Log in

In vivo comparison between two tip pressure transducer systems

  • Published:
International journal of clinical monitoring and computing

Abstract

Experimental findings are presented of anin vivo comparison between a Sentron catheter and another tip transducer manometer: a Millar microtip catheter. Both catheters have been used simultaneously in the left ventricle of dogs. Pressure variations were elicited by drug infusion. Pressure values and derivatives obtained from both systems were compared. A cross correlation between episodes of the two pressures was computed.

Results from this study showed good correlation between left ventricular systolic pressure measured with both manometers (R=0.992, p<0.0001), end-diastolic pressure (R=0.809, p<0.0001) and between first derivatives: positive derivative (R=0.993, p<0.0001) and negative (R=0.634, p<0.0001). The mean cross correlation between both pressure signals was 0.61±0.04. In the frequency domain no statistical difference was found between the location of the maxima of the peaks. It is concluded that a Sentron manometer can be a valid alternative, at a reasonable price, to a cheaper, though less accurate fluid filled catheter and a more expensive ‘golden standard’ microtip catheter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marey EJ. Physiologie médicale de la circulation du sang. A. Delaheye édit., Paris, 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grunbaum OF. On a new method of recording alterations of pressure. J Physiol 1897;22:49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Laurens P, Bouchard F, Cornu C, Baculard P, Soulié P. Bruits et pressions cardiovasculaires enregistrésin situ à l'aide d'un micromanomètre. Arch Mal Coeur 1959; 52:121–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Millar HD, Baker LE. A stable ultraminiature catheter-tip pressure transducer. Med Biol Eng 1973; 11:86–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gould K, Treuholme S, Kennedy J.In vivo comparison of catheter manometer systems with the catheter-tip micromanometer. J Appl Physiol 1973; 34; 263–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. National Academy of Sciences: Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, NIH # 80-23, 1978

  7. Bendat JS, Piersol AG. Random data: analysis and measurements procedures. J. Wiley Publ., New York 1971: 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geddes LA. Fundamentals of blood pressure transducers. In: Indwelling and implantable pressure transducers. CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio 1977:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Courtois M, Kovacs SJ, Ludbrook PA. The transmitral pressure-flow velocity relationship: The importance of regional pressure gradients in the left ventricle. Circulation 1988; 78: 661–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hellige G. Recording of ventricular pressure by conventional catheter manometer systems. I. Minimal requirements of blood pressure recording systems and estimation of frequency response characteristics. Basic Res Cardiol 1975; 71: 319–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aubert AE, Denys BG, Meno F, Reddy PS. Investigation of gallop sounds in dogs by quantitative phonocardiography and digital frequency analysis. Circulation 1985; 71: 987–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aubert, A.E., Vrolix, M., De Geest, H. et al. In vivo comparison between two tip pressure transducer systems. J Clin Monit Comput 12, 77–83 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142487

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142487

Key words

Navigation