Abstract
Information about the use of data processing systems in prehospital emergency medicine were collected, using a questionnaire sent to all German rescue helicopter bases. Twenty-seven of the 42 German rescue helicopter bases returned the questionnaire. At present, only 15 of them take advantage of electronic data processing. All of them enter their data manually by keyboard, automatic data transfer by means of a bar code reader is available at one base only. The stored data are used for statistical analysis (n=15), quality assessement (n=10), administration (n=10), research (n=9) and education (n=7). Based on the data of this survey, one fifth of those who replied use their computer only for administrative purposes, the other also manage patient and mission data with their computer systems.
Today, documentation of a rescue mission consists of patient data, vital data, mission data and information about the procedures carried out. The use of a computer system, however, requires more time and work than a handwritten record, when most of the data have to be entered manually using a keyboard. Future developments may include automated data transfer and digitization of handwritten documents to decrease the workload of the staff. For the automation of data trabsfer, configuration and synchronisation a standardized interface in all medical devices is required. There is a clear need for the use of data processing systems in emergency medicine.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aghababian RV, Williams KA, Holbrook JA, Lew R. Computer applications in quality assurance. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992; 10: 627–47.
Eichhorn JH. Anesthesia record keeping. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1993; 10: 109–15.
Holbrook JA, Aghababian R. A computerized audit of 15,009 emergency department records. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19: 139–44.
Abenstein JP, De Vos CB, Abel MD, Tarhan S. Eight years experience with automated anesthesia record keeping: Lessons learned-new directions taken. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1992; 9: 117–29.
Gardner RM, Huff SM. Computers in the icu: Why? What? and so what? Int J Clin Monit Comput 1992; 9: 199–205.
Herden HN, MOecke H. Bundeseinheitliches Notarztprotokoll. Notarzt 1992; 8: 42–5.
Wittenber J, Shabot MM. The medical device data language for the P1073 medical information bus standard. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1990; 7: 91–8.
P 1073 Standard for Medical Device Communications-Overview and Framework. IEEE; June 1994.
Felleiter P, Breschinski W, Lampl L, Bock KH. Quality assurance measures in the area of secondary transport. Part I: Fundamentals and methodological requirements. Anaesth Intensivmed 1994; 35: 73–7.
Felleiter P, Breschinski W, Lampl L, Bock KH. Measures for quality assurance in secondary transportation. Part II: Results of an investigation involving 204 patients. Anaesth Intensivmed 1994; 35: 106–9.
O'Leary DS, O'Leary MR. From quality assurance to quality improvement. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992; 10: 477–92.
Williams RM. Public policy and quality assurance. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992; 10: 493–506.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Felleiter, P., Helm, M., Lampl, L. et al. Data processing in prehospital emergency medicine. J Clin Monit Comput 12, 37–41 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142445
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142445