Abstract
Ovarian stimulation with heterologous gonadotropins over a period of a single month did not depress the fecundity or fecundability of 50 rhesus monkeys as compared to 60 untreated monkeys in a timed breeding colony. The birth rates, seasonality of births, interbirth intervals, and waiting time to the next pregnancy were not significantly different before treatment, after treatment, or among the untreated. The stillbirth rate was not increased after treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dyke B, Gage TB, Mamelka PM, Goy RW, Stone WH: A demographic analysis of the Wisconsin Regional Primate Center Rhesus Colony, 1962–1982. Am J Primatol 1986;10: 257–269
Johnson LD, Petto AJ, Boy DS, Sehgal PK, Beland ME: The effect of perinatal and juvenile mortality on colony-born production at the New England Regional Primate Research Center.In Primates, The Road to Self-Sustaining Populations, K Benirschke (ed) New York, Springer-Verlag, 1986, pp 771–779
Biggers JD: The potential use of artificially produced monozygotic twins for comparative experiments Theriegenology 1986;26:1–25
Bavister BD, Dees HC, Schultz RD: Refractoriness of rhesus monkeys to repeated ovarian stimulation by exogeneous gonadotropins is caused by formation of non-precipitating antibodies. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 1986;11:11–16
Bennett WI, Dufau ML, Catt KJ, Tullner WW: Effect of human menopausal gonadotropin upon spermatogenesis and testosterone production in juvenile rhesus monkeys, Endocrinology 1973;92:813–821
Batta SK, Stark RA, Brackett BG: Ovulation induction by gonadotropin and prostaglandin treatments of rhesus monkeys and observations of the ova. Biol Reprod 1978;18:264–278
Balmaceda JP, Pool TB, Arona JB, Heitman TS, Asch RH: successfulin vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in cynomolgus monkeys. Fert Steril 1984;42:791–795
Bavister BD, Boatman DE, Leibfried L, Loose M, Vernon MW: Fertilization and cleavage of rhesus monkey oocytesin vitro. Biol Reprod 1983;28:983–999
Biggers JD: Fecundability.In In Vitro Fertilization and Other Assisted Reproduction, HW Jones, C Schrader (eds). New York, New York Academy of Sciences, 1988, pp 706–714
Everitt BS: The Analysis of Contingency Tables. London, Chapman and Hall, 1977
Williams DA: Tests for differences between several small proportions. Appl Stat 1988;37:421–434
McGill R, Tukey JW, Larsen WA: Variations of box plots Am Stat 1978;32:12–16
Kafadar, K: Notched box-and-whisker plots.In Encyclopedia of statistical Sciences, S Kotz, NL Johnson (eds). New York, Wiley, 1985, Vol 6, pp. 367–370
Bradley JV: Distribution-Free Statistical Tests. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1968, pp 203–207
Daniel WW: Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences, 2nd ed. New York, Wiley, 1978, pp 383–386.
Sheps MC, Menken JA: Mathematical Models of Conception and Birth. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973
Leridon H:In Human Fertility (translated by JF Helzer). Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1977, pp. 22–47
Lewontin RC, Felsenstein J: The robustness of homogeneity tests in 2×N tables. Biometrics 1965;21:19–33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, L.D., Biggers, J.D., Sehgal, P. et al. The effect of heterologous gonadotropins on the fecundity of rhesus monkeys. J Assist Reprod Genet 6, 328–334 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01138771
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01138771