Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical evaluation of pillared clay adsorbents: Part III: The total porosity and the macrostructure of Al-pillared montmorillonite and hectorite

  • Published:
Journal of Porous Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a new class of porous materials, pillared clays have been more and more investigated as a potential substituent or complement to zeolite materials. Despite of intensive research, real industrial applications are still lacking. Somehow, the porosity of these materials is lower than what was expected. To evaluate the potential of the pillared clays as adsorbent, theoretical calculations were carried out to obtain a better insight of the influence of the PILC's macrostructure on the micro- and mesoporosity.

Assuming the layers to stack in a 3-dimensional brick-like fashion, the micro- and mesoporosity and interpillar free distance were calculated taking into account: the clay layer dimensions, interlayer free spacing, lateral distance between adjacent layers, partial pillaring/collapse and pillar symmetry. The calculations were performed for Al-pillared montmorillonite and hectorite and validated with experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

height of the mesopore

Al-pilM:

aluminium pillared montmorillonite

Al-pilH:

aluminium pillared hectorite

b :

lateral distance between two stacks

CEC:

cation exchange capacity meq/g

d pp :

interpillar free distance

H :

height of a clay layer Å

IFS:

interlayer free spacing Å

L :

length and width of a clay layer Å

P :

pillar height Å

pil/g:

number of pillars in 1 g clay

(pil/g)in :

number of pillars, in 1 g clay, intercalated between the layers

(pil/g)out :

number of pillars, in 1 g clay, not intercalated

(pil/g)tot :

total number of pillars in 1 g clay

pl/g:

number of clay layers in 1 g clay

s :

number of layers in a stack

SAav :

layer surface area available for pillaring m2/g

SABET :

BET surface area m2/g

SAmax :

maximum surface area of the clay layers m2/g

SA avmeso :

available surface area in the mesopores m2/g

Ustr:

unit structure

Ustr/g:

number of unit structures in 1 g clay

Vfree :

free volume in the unit structure

V avmeso :

calculated available mesopore volume cc/g

V ultmeso :

calculated ultimate mesopore volume cc/g

V avmicro :

calculated available micropore volume cc/g

V ultmicro :

calculated ultimate micropore volume cc/g

V1pil :

volume of one pillar cc/g

Vpil(in):

total volume of the pillars between the layers cc/g

Vpil(out):

total volume of the pillars outside the layers cc/g

Vtot :

total pore volume atp/p 0 = 0.98 cc/g

Wpil :

width of a pillar Å

Wt%pil :

weight percentage Al2O3 present as pillars

References

  1. R. Burch,Catalysis Today (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. I.V. Mitchel,Pillared Layered Structures: Current Trends and Applications (Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.L. Occelli and H.E. Robson,Expanded Clays and Other Microporous Solids (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.J. Pinnavaia, Science220, 365 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.A. Schoonheydt, J. Van den Eynde, H. Tubbax, H. Leeman, M. Stuyckens, I. Lenotte, and W.E.E. Stone, Clays Clay Miner.41(5), 598 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.A. Schoonheydt, H. Leeman, A. Scorpion, I. Lenotte, and P. Grobet, Clays Clay Miner.42(5), 518 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Mercier and C. Detellier, Clays Clay Miner.42(1), 71 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.H. De Boer, B.G. Linsen, and T.H.J. Osinga, J. Catalysis4, 643 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.Y. Zhu, N. Maes, A. Molinard, and E.F. Vansant, Microporous Materals3, 235 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Maes, H.Y. Zhu, and E.F. Vansant, J. Porous Materials2, 97 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Bargaoui, J.-F. Lambert, R. Franck, H. Suquet, and J.-L. Robert, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.91(14), 2229 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Maes, I. Heylen, P. Cool, M. De Bock, C. Vanhoof, and E.F. Vansant, J. Porous Materials (1996), (submitted).

  13. P. Cool, N. Maes, I. Heylen, M. De Bock, and E.F. Vansant, J. Porous Materials (1995), (submitted).

  14. M.L. Occelli, J.M. Dominguez, and H. Eckert, J. Catalysis141, 510 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Clearfield and B.D. Roberts, Inorg. Chem.27, 3237 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Molinard,Physicochemical and Gas Adsorption Properties of Ion Exchanged Alumina Pillared Clays (Ph.D. Thesis, University of Antwerp (UIA), Belgium, 1994), p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.J. Gregg and K.S.W. Sing, Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity (Academic Press Inc., London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.A. Schoonheydt,Clays, from two to three Dimensions in Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis (Elsevier Science, B.V., Amsterdam, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Bock, M., Maes, N., Cool, P. et al. Theoretical evaluation of pillared clay adsorbents: Part III: The total porosity and the macrostructure of Al-pillared montmorillonite and hectorite. J Porous Mater 3, 207–216 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01137909

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01137909

Keywords

Navigation